Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
Obama strikes again !
Plainly and obviously unconstitutional (and against international laws as well), there's not really any reasonable debate to be had about it, but we've done a fantastic job constructing a legal system that can rationalize whatever behavior we've decided could potentially be in the best interests of "security".
International laws maybe. But I don't know if a terrorist suddenly has constitutional rights the moment he is captured.
Probably not, it's at least not obvious that they do. If they're American, they certainly do, although we've found delightful little loopholes to pretend they don't.
Yeah, but let's not pretend that even Americans in Yemen with Al-Qaida aren't fair targets to be droned.
I'm skeptical, but it's a lot more reasonable to me than capturing someone and holding them indefinitely without trial.
I'm not blaming Obama. The stupidity of our Gitmo policy requires a sort of emergent complexity that defies individual blame.
More or less. As I've bitched about repeatedly, the idea that the parties are the same on civil liberties drives me nuts. Congressional Democrats aren't very good (they voted in favor of the original Patriot Act, for example), but they're much less bad (they voted against renewing the Patriot Act, for example).
Spoken like a true terrorist. Detain this man until he proves he is not a terrorist... indefinitely if needed.
Seriously though, I like government powers to have defined limits. Change it from "indefinite" to "up to 1 year" or something reasonable. It shouldn't take forever to figure out if someone is a terrorist.