Other - Explain in your post
Last edited by Darsithis; 2013-10-04 at 02:21 AM.
Beware of the man who works hard to learn something, learns it, and finds himself no wiser than before... He is full of murderous resentment of people who are ignorant without having come by their ignorance the hard way. -Kurt Vonnegut, "Cat's Cradle"
"Not everything on the internet is true." -- Abraham Lincoln
Good is the enemy of great.
It serves a completely different purpose and audience from Flex. So that would be a yes. It should stay around and according to those who actually make those decisions, it's not going anywhere. Not our call in any case.
Removing stuff from the game just because people dislike it or believe it soils the experience only means that those people should simply ignore it.
Complicated concept, I know.
Discussing moderation is against the rules and makes a post liable for an infraction. Please report problem posts instead of responding to them. If anyone is unclear about the rules please read our FAQ. Thanks.
Sturgeon's Law states that 90% of everything is crap. When posting try and be in the 10% once in a while. It makes it better for everyone.
Give it up. They're never gonna get rid of LFR.
it can replace it when flex is queuable, which would then basically be lfr, so no blizzard should not remove it.
Too cool for a signature
Do people still not realize that the appeal of LFR for most is not the easier difficulty, but the ability to do it by yourself whenever you want? As long as flex requires groups like standard raiding, it will never be a replacement for LFR and should not be thought of as such.
This is such a tired argument.
They have to keep it because they gave the bads a way to feel like they're not bad.
Imagine the subs that would leave if they got rid of LFR and expected the bads to actually l2p.
You don't create "justice" by destroying. That includes buildings, cars, or the careers of the people you want "justice" for.
Derinii - Wyrmrest Accord | <WIP>
Why? Because it has 0 effect.
I would love LFR to be removed and then see TOC type ´raids´ for an entire expansion. 4 bosses, all reused artwork.. Then maybe the OP would get a clue.
No. Too many raid modes fractures the game's sense of fantastical reality. Modes should be done as they were in Ulduar, which adheres to this idea of fantastical reality.
But they will keep it. Because people use it.
With heroics available..should they replace normals?
With normals available...should they replace flex?
With flex available...should they replace LFR?
Why answer "NO" to the first two but "YES" to the third?
http://us.battle.net/wow/en/forum/to...261?page=8#154Originally Posted by Blizzard Entertainment
I was going to post something about "Why is it so hard to understand that flex and LFR cater to entirely different people?" - Flex can only replace LFR if Flex becomes as convenient as LFR, meaning you can queue for it, whenever you want, but that defeats the purpose of the flex part ... but then I saw that this was one of THESE threads and decided eh whatever.
Nov 2014: Through inaction MMO-Champion moderators confirm that it is perfectly fine to link to hate groups in signatures.