You can't force breakthroughs by throwing money at it - I agree - but our current strategy of devoting three grad students, the spare time of a couple NASA employees, some used Popsicle sticks, elastic bands, and some bendy pipecleaners - is probably going a little over the deep end on the 'light touch' strategy. As a planet, we have practically stopped all major scientific research since the 90's - a few projects not withstanding (LHC, for example).
Agencies like NASA (it's not just America's fault here) are all massively underfunded in their research divisions. Politicians want the showy stuff, they want repeats of what already works - so they can show off. The Pentagon gets more on-the-books (to exclude black budgets) funding in a single year now, than NASA has gotten since it began (including the entire space race, and every launch ever since).
Maybe we need to declare a War on Space to get something done here - but the idea that we can't get things done by trying is a pretty dangerous one. If we had an actual FTL division, building actual prototypes - we could have FTL in a decade - or we could wait a hundred years until some whiz kid builds an FTL drive in their garage - out of ping pong balls and curly straws.
The only scientific research that gets done during a time of war, is Applied Science - we build off what we already know, to make things we already knew we could. We need more emphasis on invention, on redefining the boundaries of the real: because in the grand scheme of things we still know next to nothing. There is so much more to learn, and we barely even try anymore.
#WarOnSpace
That's what we need