Hey there.
Was watching a stream and less than an hour ago, the streamer was banned. Also important to mention that he has a lot of viewers and he's constantly spammed ingame through the chat or any kind of invite (party, wargame, etc).
So, player A (the one who reported) spammed the streamer. Apparentely he also typed on /s that he'd give 1000g for a duel. The streamer obviously never read that, there's way too much spam.
By now player A was already in ignore list because of the spam.
However, player A trades the streamer 1000g and presses accept. The streamer just accepts. There was absolutely no agreement on "duel for gold", ever.
Conclusion: player A reports the streamer because he took the gold and never dueled him/put him on ignore. Streamer gets banned.
Did the streamer just go against the TOS? Let's also say that player A's nickname was against the TOS and the GM that handled the case never noticed (much competence).
The streamer appealed against the ban and the next GM said the ban was correctly applied.
I wanna see what you guys think of this. I've had bad experiences with the TOS before and with some braindead rules there regarding pugs + masterloot/ninja leaders.
Who's wrong in this situation?