The social democrats in Sweden has a history of sterilizing "unwanted people" and all the parties in Sweden pretty much stood behind the idea of "Scientific racism" or whatever to call it in the past. They have a history of it, almost all of them. So, should one suspect them of wanting to do that now just because of their history?
I mean, the social democrats says they want to lower the immigration rate. Is that related to their history of "scientific racism"?
Last edited by mmocfb6c003936; 2014-02-07 at 06:11 AM.
It's still been done in recent times for some people.
http://www.thelocal.se/20130111/45550
The link doesn't change my point. That you don't recognize the dog whistle means you were probably in its target audience.
You have two links. You have evidence of an observed and pervasive issue with racism in the UKIP. Then you have a country with a large middle eastern immigrant population and they say they want to send all of "the immigrants" home.
You're either reading between the lines or you're being an idiot.
I'm not assuming anything until they specifically state so. The majority of the immigrants are european immigrants. They were concerned about eastern europe, so was Sweden, when countries there joined EU due to free movement within EU and the effects it would have on the countries.
So, I'll see it as you being hypersensitive about anything relating to immigration and being against immigration.
For me it largely depends on when the cut-off point of 'all of the immigrants' is, 5th-8th century AD and I'd be happy because I've always wanted to visit Norway. Any earlier and its a no-deal, the roman empire would be too hot for me.
The woman in question is basically in favour of the repatriation of naturalized citizens. Their latest scaremongering centered around Romania with an "estimated" number of immigrants ranging in the thousands expected on the first day. Guess what? There were like 3 people who came into the country from Romania who were not already British citizens returning from visiting family. They're trying to create animosity through fear mongering that has no basis in reality. The only explanation for that is prejudice.