I don't know. I did quite a bit of all of those and flight was what actually REDUCED it to tedious chore status, so I really feel for those who are going to try it without flight (particularly Archaeology).
I suspect that there will be a lot less optional filler activity going on without flight and a lot more queueing. It remains to be seen I guess.
- - - Updated - - -
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/arti...tays-same.html
I doubt they reduced the weight without reducing the peanut volume.
Ironically, they seemed to claim that it was for our benefit too (sound familiar?).
Money... it's what business is all about.
Last edited by Wingspan; 2014-11-14 at 11:43 PM.
Those without flight just want it over quicker. I'm refering particularly to a poster who keeps refering to the process of doing these tasks as boring without flight, not you particularly so apologies if I make it seem so. But this is his reasoning:
These tasks are BORING. With flight they become TOLERABLE.
What does flight do? reduce the time between the nodes, it makes no difference to the actual task.
It is sort of like saying that being shot in the head makes death fun when compared to being strangled.
I didn't say anything about them doing it, I stated about buying them. Have you thrown them down in protest and stopped eating chocolate because thats what all conglomerates do?I doubt they reduced the weight without reducing the peanut volume.
Money... it's what business is all about.
Last edited by mmoc828371db61; 2014-11-14 at 11:39 PM.
I don't think it's so much of a gate but rather lazy game design and a path to make future content easier/ quicker...and well just a disconnect in general between the fairy tale blizzard think it's players play this game versus the reality to how they've played since launch.
Think about this: by their own admission, blizzard knows that when we are inconvenienced with a meaningless shit encounter, we roll our eyes and huff and puff...so lol their answer to this is to increase those nothing shit encounters Ina hopes that we will suddenly enjoy them?
Lol.
They will say in the same quote..."we took out flight because we have to be honest with our selves over what's fun". And then follow that quote by saying "we taken great lengths to try and remove the 'pain' spots of ground travel...
Lol.
So they have acknowledged that ground travel can suck, and shit encounters are annoying at best...so their answer is to increase ground travel, and shit encounters...
They are going to find out the hard way that by the end of vanilla, when wow was full of all these annoyances, people were very grateful that they put in flying mounts....
Cause ya know...nothing has greatly changed between vanilla and now to ale me think that history of player opinion won't repeat itself.
But you keep thinking that somehow this time will be different...
Now will people quit? I'd say it drops to 5 mil. But I can tell you this, after that new smell has worn off...even your idiotic roommate is gonna huff and puff when he's dazed off his mount traversing that same slightly sloping path in an attempt to complete whatever mundane task blizzard has added to the game in an attempt to keep people from sitting in their garrisons.
And maybe then, he might think to himself, "ya know what? This really does kinda suck". Or maybe he's too stupid to realize that nothing was added but more annoyances.
Lol
Last edited by Drytoast; 2014-11-14 at 11:44 PM.
If it truly made no difference to the actual task, then there would be no real reason (at least any that Bliz has given) to remove it. They perpetually claim that it alters the tasks that it sets before to the point of triviality. It is almost the only reason they have ever given for the change.
This is almost TOO easy to answer.
First, there will not be a lot of savings for this particular expansion, because they needed to flesh-out things pretty well in case it all goes to hell (and be flight-ready).
Long term plan... if they can cut flight from the next expansion, the 1st HUGE benefit is that they don't spend money to finish any terrain that you can't access (which is a lot). Any building, mountain, statue, or anything that you can't see from the ground (or a flight path) can be completely unfinished in the Z-axis. So you will have structures without a roof and mountains with gaping volcano-like holes in them. This is not a tin-foil hat scenario... this is actually how Azeroth was constructed before Cata.
Second, since we have grown used large zones with flight, it is only a matter of time before they realize that they can shrink the overall maps a bit and shave a lot of dollars out of the budget (Timeless Isle did it... it was one of the smallest mini-zones ever released).
With travel speed cut more than 50%, it would not be hard to shave (let's say) 20% off of the x and y dimensions and still have the world "feel" like it is just as large as zones that you are used to. It might even feel larger while actually being smaller if you put some windy paths and difficult terrain in it. Even just a 20% cut in each dimension results in almost 33% less terrain to digitally sculpt.
That is a lot of profit margin to retain and money to be made. It is literally what the Snickers people did that I referenced above... charge the same for the product while giving them less product. It's a long-term profit plan, not really a mystery.
Last edited by Wingspan; 2014-11-15 at 12:11 AM.
Yep. You got me all figured out. Just like I fully support their cash shop in a subscription based game. and their oversimplification of just about everything. Your stupid generalizations of people who support no flying discredits you even further than you've already been discredited. No wonder nobody takes you seriously.
What's wrong? You and Maneo spent 1000 pages crying that removing flying was a mechanism to gate content, yet leveling sped up. So much for not backing up anything you say.
You said it was LOGISTICALLY impossible for shit like mining, gathering, etc to remain the same. Yet if the SPED up levelling, let's just see how fast it is to gather materials at level 100. I'm sorry if it looks like I'm gloating, because I am.
Well so far their lazy gameplay has crashed servers, many are unable to log in. I think this could be for many reasons, producing shit content does not seem like one of them. Unless you can present some reason why people are queueing in their thousands for access to shit content?
There are a ton of meaningless content. All raids to me are meaningless content, why would I enjoy it now? I'd still have to do it. They have always increased the meaningless shit content every time they brought out a new raid patch.Think about this: by their own admission, blizzard knows that when we are inconvenienced with a meaningless shit encounter, we roll our eyes and huff and puff...so lol their answer to this is to increase those nothing shit encounters Ina hopes that we will suddenly enjoy them?
Hilarious... do you actually laugh at these?Lol.
[quote]They will say in the same quote..."we took out flight because we have to be honest with our selves over what's fun". And then follow that quote by saying "we taken great lengths to try and remove the 'pain' spots of ground travel...[quote]
Tee hee hee heeLol.
Define shit encounters. To me, personally shit encounters = any raid boss. Ergo any raid boss is a shit encounter therefore remove all raid bosses.So they have acknowledged that ground travel can suck, and shit encounters are annoying at best...so their answer is to increase ground travel, and shit encounters...
People were excited for them, but before the news of them I had not heard 1 person crying for their inclusion.They are going to find out the hard way that by the end of vanilla, when wow was full of all these annoyances, people were very grateful that they put in flying mounts....
You seem to think flying between vanilla and now has created a massive shift in opinion.Cause ya know...nothing has greatly changed between vanilla and now to ale me think that history of player opinion won't repeat itself.
No... just coming from someone who owns every store mount on 2 accounts.... most people do not care. Personal I'm sure, but relative.But you keep thinking that somehow this time will be different...
Oh my room-mate is an idiot? Despite the fact I called him a house mate and not a room mate because we share a house and not a room. I let him know and in response he called you a person of substandard intelligence whose parents were probably brother and sister.Now will people quit? I'd say it drops to 5 mil. But I can tell you this, after that new smell has worn off...even your idiotic roommate is gonna huff and puff when he's dazed off his mount traversing that same slightly sloping path in an attempt to complete whatever mundane task blizzard has added to the game in an attempt to keep people from sitting in their garrisons.
Or perhaps he puts more emphasis on other things. Like you should do, since you know longer play this abomination of a game. For all the hours you've spent arguing against it..... tally it up..... now how much is that as a percentage of time you would have saved if they enabled flight from max level instead of when they said they would?And maybe then, he might think to himself, "ya know what? This really does kinda suck". Or maybe he's too stupid to realize that nothing was added but more annoyances.
Hehehehehe hilarious!Lol
They are not removing it because of the tasks... they just want to ensure people's percieved objectives are not unduly hindered because of it.Originally Posted by Wingspan
Moderation note: Knock it off with the personal attacks. Talk about flying and no-flying and spend less time insulting one another.
"...money's most powerful ability is to allow bad people to continue doing bad things at the expense of those who don't have it."
A task is an action with an objective... sometimes called a quest even.
If you are skipping mobs and hitting a quest target it is much the same as skipping mobs and doing an Archaology plot.
So if all that flight does is "reduce the time between the nodes, it makes no difference to the actual task" (your words), then it would not matter if that "node" were a mine, an archaeology plot, or a quest target.
I missed this response.
Not chocolate specifically, but yeah, there have been more than a few times in my life where a product was reduced in some capacity and I decided to stop buying the product. I know full well it's what conglomerates do and I get to decide if I support it or not... sometimes yes, sometimes no (it's everyday life).