Please note my source is anecdotal being my father/uncles/cousins who were in prison for violent crimes/drug charges.
If people are talking about the stereotypical "Big Bubba" coming for your "Cornbread" type of rape, then yes it is overly dramatic in comparison to real life. Shashank Redemption style ordeals are not common, but even when they occur they are not frequently reported unless medical attention is required. One of my cousins, was the victim of a prison rape, he was assaulted with a object and simply remained quiet until the need for medical attention was to great. His reasoning was, he didn't want to set himself up for the ridicule and harassment that it would entail (lets be honest prison is a fairly social place given your there with each other for a while), he also admitted as much that after nearly 20 years (I think it was 18 total) that he only knew of one other forced rape. He also never mentioned why he was attacked, but he was reprimanded behind bars for contraband and alcohol.
What many people consider to be sexual assault though, while equally under reported are a bit more frequent. The only reason I mention it as sexual assault rather then rape, is many people hold male on male sexual acts to different standards. Once again it was never made to be a rampant event either, I mean people are not going willy nilly coercing other individuals into blow jobs, but the truth was they all (who are not incarcerated and talk about it talking 4/6 and 3 of those 4) admitted that sometimes people were coerced into doing things they otherwise wouldn't do.
I do understand that it is a small sample size, of anecdotal data, but it is people I know personally with first hand experience. So yes the media representation of it is fairly overblown, but it is not something is just completely unheard of either. But it would seem to be that the social consquences of reporting are at times a greater risk then the fear of continued abuse (unless the fear in reporting is more abuse but it was never really implied that way.)
Delete.........
Well there are two types of deterrence, general and specific. While there actually is a case for arguing that it does function as a form of specific deterrence, meaning that it does prevent that specific person from committing more crime what you're saying it's a general deterrent meaning that it makes other people less likely to commit murder. There is just no evidence that this is the case.
Another thing that I haven't seen mentioned are truth-in-sentencing laws. They ensure that an individual serves the vast bulk of his time in prison and essentially eliminate parole. While on the surface this may seem like a good thing the trouble is that it removes the valuable tool of parole from the correctional institutes. If they have the ability to control to some degree how long an individual will spend in prison than they can use that to enforce good behavior from inmates while they are incarcerated.
Last edited by dehotz; 2014-04-08 at 06:42 AM.
Someone who spends 8 hours a day supervising prisoners will always lose to someone who spends 24 hours being one.
American (could be other countries as well, can't say) prisons aren't about rehabilitating prisoners. They're an industrial complex, where the people who own and run those prisons (private companies) make more money the more prisoners there are in them.
That's why there's so many people doing hard time, years and years, for smoking a single joint and so on.
Because in America we have a FOR PROFIT prison system that just so happens to hold the world's largest prison population. And they throw you in a cage for smoking a plant. But whatever, it's not a scam or anything...
That's probably a huger part of it than what you replied to said. The whole issue of scruples is less actually motivated by scruples and more by a need to feel like there's someone out there that's beneath them, which really isn't even remotely the case if we're looking at murders vs pedophilia. They probably just fancy themselves as higher class criminals.
- - - Updated - - -
Wow, someone actually thinks this should be a thing.
- - - Updated - - -
No, the deterrence is the main factor. Punishment and rehabilitation come afterward, and the degree to which either is emphasized varies with the country.
Well, you're right. Maybe nobody does hard time for smoking a joint.
http://www.theweedblog.com/man-gets-...-of-marijuana/
Had two possession convictions, was found with 15 grams (half an ounce) of marijuana, got 20 years.Mr. Ladd was sentenced to twenty years in prison for possessing just 15 grams of marijuana. In Louisiana, if you have been convicted of marijuana possession three times you can get 20 years in prison.
Sure sure, it's not the same, but it's still completely and utterly ridiculous.
I've seriously lost a lot of respect for many posters in this thread. People fuck up, they go to prison... Prison itself is punishment because you cannot be part of the real world, the rehab part that Scandinavian prisons do is a fantastic thing because it often helps people not re commit crimes.
Now I don't know about you guys but I don't think I should have rotted away forever in a cell because I lashed out at my mother once after she hit me. I went to jail and the jail where I live is known to be much worse than prison. It was pretty much solitary confinement and it was hard to sleep the day away plus the food, the food was not enough to sustain my hunger. I was hungry constantly and there are many of you in here saying that people like me should rot away forever because I got into a brawl with my mother? Go to hell.
Hey everyone
Slow down fella...
I understand your anger, trust me. You have first hand experience, and of course you cannot understand the views of many posters here.
But you also have to consider the source..
What is the source? With your post count, I'm pretty certain you know...
This place has a small fraction of awesome people who may not always agree on everything, and are then more or less passionately discussing out their disagreements. They show always respect (at least the will) for their discussion partners. And that's where debates are fun and more than often productive. And then you got the huge pot of all kinds of other people.
Misinformed, low educated, too young to know, too much of their own burden, misanthropes, bigots, homophobes, trolls, jerks, radicals, ignorant, and of course also not so smart people, and a whole array of other counter productive contributors.
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
Well, in the USA, I would say the answer is: people don't really care.
I think most People here view prison as a place to put criminals, to keep them away from law abiding citizens. So prison, or a grave, either way, they are kept away from law abiding citizens.
Changing prisons to rehabilitation centers is something rarely talked about in the USA.
You know this because mind reading.
- - - Updated - - -
Or they have no other choice, or a hundred other reasons.
- - - Updated - - -
Your world view is so sheltered.
Show them that they do need help and how to get it perhaps?
But it does exist. There are prisons where they rehabilitate people..
A few pages earlier I provided a link to a college program, where inmates in fact graduate and get degrees.
For which I suspect, makes these graduates more productive and accomplished than some who vow for harsh sentences or even execution.
"The pen is mightier than the sword.. and considerably easier to write with."
That is a pretty long post for you to start off saying you can remove human emotions completely, and then end with how they can be reduced to manageable levels.
- - - Updated - - -
Chemical imbalance in the brain? Mental illness? Alcohol/drugs?
- - - Updated - - -
Mainly because acting to satisfy an urge isn't malicious, even if the outcome is violent or deadly.
In order for something to be malicious, by definition, there has to be malice towards the victim.
I think maybe your definition is off.
- - - Updated - - -
For a 23 year old, you sure are an expert on criminal psychology.
(and by that, I mean you aren't)
I find it hilarious when people probably still in university or living at home with their parents (i don't know your situation but I know you're only 23) pretend to be such experts on complex subjects like this. You know why the criminals commit crimes, the best sentencing practices, how to avoid recitivism, how much money their food should cost, how many criminals are mentally ill in any way, the best ways to avoid becoming a criminal, and a host of other crime/punishment related "facts".
I'm shocked that Sweden hasn't asked you to head up their department of corrections or whatever you guys call it over there, to be honest.
Last edited by BLCalliente; 2014-04-08 at 01:24 PM.