No the point I was attempting to make, and perhaps not being as clear as I could, is when you say he is a holocaust denier people are going to think you are talking about the nazi/jewish holocaust. And it is naive to think that people won't think that.
There is an episode of Curb Your Enthusiasm that this reminded me of
Well, apparently this thread is now about holocaust denial ?
I am the one who knocks ... because I need your permission to enter.
Its more about Cenk Uygur (the guy in the video). I guess there's just not a lot to say about Ted Cruz making an idiot of himself yet again.
- - - Updated - - -
I got that. I just don't think it matters which particular horrible act of racially motivated mass murder a person is denying happened and thus doesn't make sense to distinguish.
I think it matters depending on the varying levels of evidence to support each claim. Although the Armenian genocide seems to be substantiated enough that maybe I'm just giving him too much of the benefit of the doubt.
Interesting side point here, on the Armenian genocide wikipedia page it says it's the second most studied case of genocide after the Holocaust, using those exact terms, further proving my point that referring to something as the Holocaust would lead almost all to think you were talking about one thing in particular.
In any case the article he wrote in '99 was a pretty short letter to the editor expressing some skepticism and he hasn't commented that I've seen on the subject since, I wonder if those are still his views, people can change a lot in 15 years, but as I said, maybe I'm just giving him too much of the benefit of the doubt.
Cruz and the right have been using Fox and other bias polling sites and sample pools to show that people hate OBamacare. First time they use an unbiased source they find that most people actually like it. Go figure.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
I agree that people can change their opinion. The problem is that Cenk refuses to clarify his position. Even when the question was the highest voted on his reddit ask me anything. That's not cool.
I generally like Cenk, but people should be aware of this as it may color how you interpret what he has to say.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
This guy has been trying to be the Rush Limbaugh of the left. I like to listen to Rush. It's comforting to listen to a big booming voice on AM radio espousing (mostly) views that are congruent with my own.
If I want to challenge my thinking, I'm better off watching the Daily Show than this blowhard at TYT. This might be against the TOS of this forum to say this, but TYT is a troll, and nothing more. This whole video was a celebration of the troll.
Amateur.