Unless they are armed and breaking in, I'd kill them
If they are unarmed, i'll shoot them non-lethally and call the police
“I want him dead.” Saying this about a kid who broke into your house and shooting him point blank in the head execution style is not defending your property. That's straight up murder.
If you live in an armed society, particularly in a state that holds the "Castle doctrine" you know the risk when you break into another persons house.
They won't rob another house, and he won't ever be robbed by them again. If you think that they deserved any less than they got you're a fool. They could have done anything to him had he not had the ability to defend himself. You do not break into another persons house.
If they weren't criminals in the first place they would still be alive. This is the same think as the stand your ground law. Don't want to get shot? Don't attack people.
That suggests that Trayvon didn't attack him. Which the defense had plenty of evidence for. Young lean football player, tall, strong, history of violence and burglary. VS Neighborhood watch asthmatic with an eating disorder. I'm sure he started it, having grass stains on his back and a broken nose, as well as not a shred of evidence that his fists were used in any form of attack.
He's innocent in the eyes of law, move on. One less thug in the world.
So the girl was shot 5 times in the chest, yet people are upset about the sixth shot that was a 'good, clean finishing shot.' What do you think her chances of survival were before the paramedics got there after taking five in the chest?