About 4 years, actually.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraini...e%27s_Republic
About 4 years, actually.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ukraini...e%27s_Republic
Well his link showed some other entity which lasted half a year.
Yet the value of both is equally close to zero. You know in those times if someon on Kamchatka declared independance, it'd take a looong time just to cross the country and fix it.
As for UA - it's closer but it's in the middle of multiple conflicts. It does not matter just like those lands that were ocupied by Hitler before we took them back, even though some of them were occupied for several years
What does that have to do with anything? If some guys say they say they want to create their own nation what does that have to do with the definition of a country?
They're not Ukrainian patriots if they want to break away and get annexed by Russia.
Great job, I never said I support the killing of civilians.So their "defending the country" consists of killing and bombing citizens of their own country.
Great job, protecting the country by destroying it!
- - - Updated - - -
Well, western Ukrainians do seem to have it easy calling themselves Ukrainian patriots. Besides, being a patriot is about supporting your country, not necessarily supporting the regime of the country.
In late XIX - early XX centuries some then-Ruthenian thinkers started promoting a new name for their nation because they didn't like that Muscovites stole their old name. They chose the word "Ukraine". Some Ruthenians didn't accept name change and still call themselves like 100 years ago. "Rusyn" is how "Ruthenian" sounds in Ukrainian language, it's the same word; I'm using English form because this is English-language forum.
1. I call it Poland because those lands that you call proper Ukraine are mostly historically polish. And preceding your question, no, you dont create an ethnicity defining it by hatred towards Russia. It doesnt work that way.
2. There are no historically Ukrainian lands. Ukraine is created by Soviet leadership as a bunch of areas (most of those were recently attached to Russian Empire and Soviet Russia later) with one goal - to be governed from Kiev.
Yes but are you implying that 6 month or even 4 years was enough to found something that can now be called "Ukrainian etnicity"?
"Ukrainian etnicity" if we assume such things exists, surelly does not have those 'states' as their base. Than what does?
Russians are Russians, even if the territory they live in has a bi-colored flag and if their ancestors are mixed with way more Poland representatives than other Russians.
That's my point of view, i'm no doctor of Ethnology or something
Well, ethnic poles have a thing against russians historically (and it's, as I've stated earlier, kind of justified). But the thing is - ethnic russians are not only in Russia, they are very significant ethnos in their own country aswell. And if they want to keep their country and make it peaceful they have to deal with it. That's the only problem in here, it doesnt have anything to do with regime, other than the fact that ALL pro-eastern ukrainian politics are labbeled criminals and traitor. Eastern Ukraine doesnt have anyone who would support their interests.
They didn't forget, they refused to change their name. Yes, the English word "Ruthenian" is used for historic purposes, like I did; for modern Ruthenians a direct loanword "Rusyn" is used. This is still exactly the same word in Ukrainian language, different forms are used in English.