Next Cash Shop Mount! Which would you like to see?

[Jaylock]

Lets say Blizzard was going to put another mount in the cash shop before WoD arrives to tide us all over. Which of these cash shop mounts would you like to see put in?

• Deathwing Mount (looks like deathwing)
• Red Hearthsteed
• Green Drake (this is the only drake color missing from the game)
• Flaming Chimera (think alysrazor but chimera)

Personally I would love for them to put a Deathwing looking mount in the cash shop. It would be such an awesome looking mount. Poll Inc.

All these mounts you could ride on the ground as a ground mount in any non-flying areas.

[Pebrocks The Warlock]

Personally I'd like to see an announcement stating the Cash Shop is being closed and all items will be obtainable some way in game.
I think that's a better choice than anything you've posted.

[MrKnubbles]

Personally I'd like to see an announcement stating the Cash Shop is being closed and all items will be obtainable some way in game.

You just like that option because you want that stuff for free.

[Aeula]

I'd prefer they didn't, I'd never use the mount no matter how epic it was.
Kor'kron War Wolf for life!

[mercychan]

I'd like to see the Deathwing mount go up for $50!

[McNeil]

Where's the none option? Why can't we just have the mounts obtainable in game?

On second thought, I would like to see a cow as mount that keeps saying ''we both know how it feels to be milked, do we!''

[Tastyfish]

To conclude the absurd justification for price increases, I would like to see a 2 person mount for 50 dollars, because I have this theory. Someone will argue that it's 50 because it's 2 mounts, cause 2 people can use it at once. lol

A green drake tho ( with yellowish feets) would be great to see and I would buy it, so I could finish my collection.

[Deleted]

I would rather have all mounts available in game but if I had to choose I would love to see a green drake.

[mercychan]

To conclude the absurd justification for price increases, I would like to see a 2 person mount for 50 dollars, because I have this theory. Someone will argue that it's 50 because it's 2 mounts, cause 2 people can use it at once. lol

A green drake tho ( with yellowish feets) would be great to see and I would buy it, so I could finish my collection.

New store mount: Magic School Bus! A new 15 seater mount, Cost: $375, however, flying will be removed in Draenor, so it's basically just a bus.

[Pebrocks The Warlock]

You just like that option because you want that stuff for free.

Not at all. It's just my opinion that P2P games should not have a cash shop. Plain and simple.

[Deleted]

Green Drake seems unlikely. Too unspectacular for a store mount if they would want to make it look like the others.
Deathwing mount would certainly be nice.

[Arrashi]

Invisible mount for 100$. People would still buy it.

[Deleted]

none, I pay a sub fee and I'm entitled (meaning I should be able to earn them ingame) to all the mounts anyway, tehy should all be in the game

the shop is an insult, I was fine with it when they created silly pets, but now we got more cash shop mounts than content it seems

[Forgettable]

It would be irrelevant to me because I would never buy it anyway.

[Yarathir]

All mounts should be attainable in the game, simple as that.

I'm not too against the shop, but I would like to be able to farm an Armored Bloodwing or Grinning Reaver in-game or something. As a boss drop, rep reward, etc.



Sadly, I think it would just increase the hatred for the shop. It sounds strange, but I'd expect a lot of "I worked hard for my Iron Skyreaver mount and some scrub can just pay 20 bucks to get it without effort!".

[Deleted]

Invisible mount for 100$. People would still buy it.

Shit, i would pay 5 euros to be able to fly without mount. Swimming animation or whatever. Monk "flying" and flying disc ftw!

[Jaylock]

Given who you are and your well-documented stances on certain things, this thread was obviously only made to stir shit up. How surprising.

All mounts should be attainable in the game, simple as that.

Just vote for one of the options that you would like to see. Simple as that.

[Dristereau]

Where's the none option? Why can't we just have the mounts obtainable in game?

On second thought, I would like to see a cow as mount that keeps saying ''we both know how it feels to be milked, do we!''

This made me laugh Or the cow. Even if it was the Cows droppings as a mount some people would buy it. Look at the latest thing in the cash shop.

[Skayth]

none, I pay a sub fee and I'm entitled (meaning I should be able to earn them ingame) to all the mounts anyway, tehy should all be in the game

the shop is an insult, I was fine with it when they created silly pets, but now we got more cash shop mounts than content it seems

Pretty much this.

They create "optional" content for real money... when we pay a sub for new content... Pretty sure I am not the only one that wants to see the world burn now.

[Yarathir]

Yeah, that was what I meant. Sure, have them in the shop but also put them in-game behind an achievement or random grind or something.

I do agree that it would increase people's hate for the store though. You already see it when a raid gets nerfed or something. How people "worked" hard for their title or something. The LK title comes to mind right now.

Yeah. Indeed. In the end, people would probably get over it though, or at least stop talking about it. And I do think making the mounts available from raid drops, quest chains, reputation farming, etc. would be pretty nice in the end.



Then again, the one upside (if you could find one) of the shop is that mounts you would normally probably not see are made. Mounts totally unrelated to relevant content are made. I could imagine them making a Deathwing-inspired drake mount for the shop for example, as they are known to add mounts that otherwise wouldn't fit as ingame obtainables (Heart of the Aspects) -- whereas I could not see them adding a Deathwing-inspired drake mount without the shop.