Funny, because I've never worked with a company that didn't promote from within, and I worked retail (and it wasn't that recently that I stopped working retail). Also, over on labor costs, inefficiency and wasting time is not that huge of a problem if you have adequate employees and employee policies. When I worked retail I could be at the register the second the customer was while still keeping my department in order. I also had the least hours worked (because of school) and the second highest sales in the department (right behind our full time person) because I could up sale like crazy. Its amazing how well you are treated if you have top sales (or close).
"The round, metal cooking utensil referring to the larger, cookware customarily used for, but not limited to, stews, as being of a dark shade or possibly of African descent." ~~ Fixed for now. But keep in mind any one of the words used in that fix may become politically incorrect or offensive at any moment for any reason. Further amendments may be required to prevent frivolous lawsuits in the future.
Internal promotions in retail are almost always a good idea. Why would you hire someone from outside the company that has no clue what your company is about or how to work your products if you have someone that is already working for you that knows your products and your company. That makes zero financial sense. Sure, when you start talking higher than maybe district manager than you probably want someone with a business degree, but until then your management staff is simply relaying orders and doing pretty much the same job as the cashiers/stock people under them except they have to count the drawers and do a balance sheet at the end of the shift.
"The round, metal cooking utensil referring to the larger, cookware customarily used for, but not limited to, stews, as being of a dark shade or possibly of African descent." ~~ Fixed for now. But keep in mind any one of the words used in that fix may become politically incorrect or offensive at any moment for any reason. Further amendments may be required to prevent frivolous lawsuits in the future.
Yes that is logically approach, but most people ain't that logically and will still try and do the tasks they normally do, and that means they have to make up for the "lost" time and that means working faster, which I think most can agree is not enjoyable, which brings us back to the OP rant about customers wasting his time.
Last edited by mmocff76f9a79b; 2014-08-07 at 05:39 PM.
Working harder to make up for the "lost" time spent on customer service is part of your job. The customer isn't wasting your time, it's those annoying jobs in between servicing customers that are wasting your time, which is why the higher up the ladder you go, the less of those piddly jobs you have to do.
The OP's rant shows they have their priorities completely arse-about-face.
The customer is always right!
That phrase is misused all the time
You said that post cards aren't of any significant monetary value.
So ask yourself this: why are we buying them?
The post cards is the bait to lure you into the shop to buy what really makes profit and increases sales.
edit: ordinary normal customers that I am more than happy to serve, buy post cards on top of other stuff, in a significant faster timeframe.
I can understand these people are on vacations and they want to spend time without necessarily spending money. But they must also respect that I have plenty of things to do on top of serving them and making sure they don't steal anything.
Last edited by Kreeshak; 2014-08-07 at 06:55 PM.
...and you failed to get any additional sales, so not only are you moaning about having to do your job, but you're not very good at it either.
Ever thought about being the bloke who spins people around at fairgrounds?
That's your concern, not theirs.
Last edited by Kalis; 2014-08-07 at 07:01 PM.
You are provocative and this is my last reply to you. Anyone including you would have failed to make additional sales on the time wasters. Its not about skill, doing your job right or wrong. It's about the time wasters not respecting other's around them. They want to spend time without being considerate about others and they are determined to not buy anything significant.
Well, statistically your company will be more successful by promoting people at random than doing the thing most companies do when they promote from within, i.e taking the best person of the job below and bumping them up.
The thing is that being a good manager requires an entirely different skillset to being a good checkout blipper. Yes, it's important to have an understanding of the company etc, but for a manager, you need someone with managerial skills, for a checkout blipper, you need someone who can keep doing mundane tasks with efficiency over a long period of time, someone who is good with customers, etc etc. These kinds of things arn't neccesarily AS important for a manager as being able to manage staff (which is entirely different to dealing with customers) and facilities.
The problem with promoting from within is you end up with horrible inefficiencies. People get promoted through all the jobs they are good at, untill they hit a job they are bad at, at which point they are doing bad so they don't get promoted any more, and they end up stuck there. Suppose the progression chain is tills > Store manager > regional manager > something else. You have Steve, who is good at tills, but bad at store managing, Bob, who is good at tills and store managing, but can't regional manage for shit, and Alice, who is awful on tills but is an absolutley baller store and regional manager. Steve is good on tills so gets a promotion, ends up store managing and sucks at it. Bob is good at tills, so gets promoted to store managing, which he is also good at, so gets promoted again and is now regional manager, which he sucks at, so doesn't get any more promotions. Alice is shit on tills so she never gets a promotion. What you now have his the three worst people for the jobs they are worst at.
So what are your options? Well, you could promote people based not on whether they are good at their current job, but whether they would be good at the job you are promoting them to. This is difficult because 1) there are few transferrable skills in many cases, so how do you know alice is good at managing because she never does any of it, you never see that she is good at these things, 2) because it requires you to be able to be an exceptional interviewer, and be able to see exactly where your staffs strengths lie from just talking to them. This is harder than you'd think because you're a store manager, not a recruiter, you arn't that good at inteiewing and people bullshit a lot in interviews, and because chances are you are in the position of store manager because you got promoted into it for being good on tills but you suck at it so never got promoted further so you probably suck at this anyway. and 3) if you promote alice to store manager when she's the worst member of the team on tills, steve and bob are going to be pissed off like hell "Why the fuck is alice getting a promotion when she's fucking worthless" and they won't respect her at all as their new manager, even though she would be best for the job.
Alternatively, you could hire someone in directly to the manager position. They don't know the store straight off, but that can be taught, and it allows the interviewing process to be a bit easier. You're hireing for a manager so you'll get people more in that bracket, rather than the minimum wage job slaves applying, and you can take references up on places where they have worked as a manager before to see how they did. Also, if you are that kind of company, you can pay a recruitment agency to find you a really good manager, and then you don't have to worry about it at all.
Of course. I am not bothered with people buying post cards and the majority of the customers. I am annoyed by the rare occurance of customers wasting my time. It's not about the post cards. They could try out everything on the shop, waste me 2 hours and still be politically correct and I could not tell them off. I am and would be annoyed though. Everyone who works on customer service will have an example to symphathise. I don't expect others to understand easily.
Why does a customer picking out a post card affect your job in any way? Do you have to like hand it to them one at a time to look at it? Or guide them through the process of buying a postcard? Aren't they usually just in a fucking rack and they just pick one out and bring it to you to pay for it?
You're there for work any way, how is it wasting your time at all?
Is this thread a fucking joke?
Virtually everyone works in customer service, the only differences are 1. the type of customer (internal, external, business, public, etc.), and 2. scale (50p postcards, multi-million pound contracts, etc.).
You are at the bottom of the rung of the customer service ladder and you can't cope with those customers! That really isn't a good place to be.
Change your attitude, or you will stay on the bottom of the ladder, and you may not like it but it is the best advice you will receive on this thread.