Users with <20 posts and ignored shitposters are automatically invisible. Find out how to do that here and help clean up MMO-OT!
PSA: Being a volunteer is no excuse to make a shite job of it.
And the problem he has is that it doesn't. That is another thing that cannot be laid at the door of feminism. As much as I dislike what the movement has become, you need to be fair, and this isn't the doing of feminism. The seeming lack of desire of feminism to tackle the issue (I've honestly never seen a feminist in mainstream media campaigning on this issue, I know that group isn't representatives of the entire movement) and some feminists (along with cunt men) make it a difficult issue to tackle ("OMG WHAT ABOUT RAEP!!! PATRIARCHY!" or "bro, man up yo") that doesn't make them responsible for causing it.
I did think the OP was somewhat lacking in taste. It did seem like he was using something tragic as a stick to bash a movement he doesn't like, holding it accountable for something that it isn't responsible for.
Whatever your opinions on the spectrum of whatever, please don't drag an innocent person into the argument. Especially when they just died.
On the issue of child support, what about splitting responsibilities 50/50? I know the situations vary from person to person, but I never got the idea that in the case of a breakup, the mother gets the kids, the father pays for them. If the father is fit to be a parent, it seems to me the most reasonable settlement is split custody, each parent pays their own way. I fail to see how being a mother means you cannot provide materially.
I don't like how fatherhood is reduced to providing material goods and little more.
And I get that, not all separations are like that. It could be the dad isn't fit to raise them, in which case child support is totally understandable. There does seem to be an inbuilt assumption that when parents go their own way, its her kids, and he has to pay, I'd like a more open minded approach to child support. I personally know guys who are kept from seeing their kids by vindictive ex's (they are in legal battles atm) but who still expect them to pay to support both of them. That is messed up.
Yeah, I would agree, but I am just trying to make it clear whether Robin Williams was or wasn't f'ing around on his wife, doesn't mean I think he should pay a Penis Tax, however, if one or the other has been unfaithful, I think that certainly bares some weight as to who should have to go to their check book a little deeper to pay for the divorce. As for Robin Williams, and these large ass figures as to what his ex wives made out with, I think like most things that get reported most of that is wildly blown out of proportion, and as bad as I feel about these tragic set of circumstances, I don't think they contributed to his death, anymore than his show recently being canceled.
Sure those can all be triggers, but depression or not we all still have to make life choices, and personally, I think the fact his entire career being in the spotlight, and probably having to balance love, life and marriage, probably had a lot more to do with the fact he may have not really been able to get the help he needed. The guy has serious problems, and money couldn't solve them because money wasn't his problem.
Dads get custody as well, and it is only fair they also recieve alimony and/or child support, and they do. Children are very expensive to care for, and child support alone rarely covers it alone. So depending on the job the parent has, it can be fair.
I'm all for people taking care of their own stuff and shouldn't need to be handheld, but that is sometimes not possible, so they should at least be entitled to a helping hand, if only temporary.
I grew up in a single-parent household for most of my life, and my dad had custody of my brother.
Random (but a bit personal) question here. Did you grow up with divorced parents?
I ask because a 50/50 custody split isn't always what's best for the child. Children are not commodities that can be handed off back and forth like a car.
Parents will have different rules and ways of life. For many children a 50/50 custody split is just flat out bad for them. Spending one week (or, in the case of my childhood friend, half a week) with one parent, then going to the other house can be very frustrating. Add in that not all divorces are amiable, and parents rant to their children and insult the other parent (which is almost like insulting half of their child) it hurts the kids. Additionally, split custody means the parents have to interact with each other more often, and in the case of a bitter divorce, it can lead to a lot of fights the children have to witness and go through. Again, my childhood friend: her parents did the 50/50 split (in her case half weeks), and it honestly messed her up a bit. She was (and still is) not the most emotionally stable person.
So, IMO, thinking of the children when it comes to custody is far more important than making sure it's "fair" for the adults. While some kids don't mind frequent moving between houses, others may not.
ETA: Also, 50/50 doesn't work when parents aren't physically close to each other. Life happens and people move for careers.
This is just a terrible thread and is in no way constructive. Closing.