Originally Posted by
Pull My Finger
I didn't. The frist two minutes put me off terribly. I can't watch a half an hour of material that's so obviously one-sided, sensationalist and out to cause damage. I've seen enough to know where to sort it.
Well my take on it is that I don't trust reviews at all in the first place. They're just not important to me. I know that "reviews", especially those in magazines, are, directly or indirectly, paid advertisement. We all know that. I couldn't care less. I don't need a site like Kotaku to tell me what game I should buy. If I'm interested in something, I'll watch videos, talk to people who's opinion and experience I generally appreciate, etc.
After all, we've been into this hobby for long enough. We're mostly able to tell crap games from the good ones, we don't really need reviews from some self-announced "gaming journalists". I think the most frustrations that seasoned gamers experience with unfortunate purchases doesn't come from the fact that they can't tell if a game is good, or right for them. It's more the fact that a lot of people just get caught up in a hype too easily, and that wishful thinking often seems to override their capabilities of objective observation.
And I certainly don't give a rat's ass about all that ridiculous and uncalled-for commentary and blogs and whatnot, that those "journalists" keep pestering us with because they're trying to make themselves important. At the end of the day, they're just hacks and scribblers. Who cares about their ramblings on feminism or whatever topic seems to be highly discussed at those sites at the moment.
So, I don't really care if the "integrity" of sites like Kotaku, Rock-Paper-Shotgun or whatever gets compromized. Those people can do what they want and go to bet with whoever they think they have to. They're free to fuck, scam and kickstart each other all day long. Idiots will be idiots, and will always quarrel and squabble about. Luckily, they're not the gaming industry. I wouldn't bee too concerned.