Sure, but you don't have an issue with people who try to get people fired or sanctioned by their employers for their opinions? Or call for industry blacklists on Pro-GG developers? Or harassing companies for not doing what they want? Or openly lying about GG activity (as has happened often) and creating a state of panic in people against GG.
When that feminist criticism takes the form of a one sided argument fueled by lies, paranoia, stolen footage, manufactured drama, and its own special brand of sexism that no one is allowed to question then the issue has nothing to do with whether games are art or not.
There's nothing wrong with feminism. What's wrong is that there are con artists hiding behind feminism as a shield and people are willingly acting as that shield due to a desire to stand for what they think is right, all the while ignoring the lies of the people they champion.
I think the correct way of describing her is questionable. Even in my limited knowledge of her speeches, she went from saying in one she was a gamer, to not even liking games in the next.
Also someone a very long time ago posted another video that countered one of Anita's videos (The damsel in distress one) very well honestly, that's a bit of a side note though.
"El Psy Kongroo!" Hearthstone Moderator
Here are a few facts for you:
The militant feminists and their fanbois and followers do just as much, if not a hell of a lot more of "shittery and harassment", towards gamers. There are a lot of gamers who don't really give two shits about the term "gamergate", but who are being attacked by these self-proclaimed "anti-GG" people, and thus those gamers more than willingly identify as pro-GG, especially since GG is really about ethics...well it would be, if it wasn't busy defending itself against those asshole feminists who claim that all gamers are murderers and rapists.
So...how do those facts sit with you?
You've got it backwards. GG wants developers to make whatever kind of videogames they like. Anita is pushing a kind of soft censorship viewpoint against specific depictions of women.
She is not directly relevant to GG though she seems to be the main influence of most contemporary video-game feminist advocates.
What Anita wants is things like the "Damsel in distress" trope to die and what not, more lead women and what not.
What some of GamerGate whats isn't that. What most will agree on is they want the freedom of whatever in the games, not for them to be restricted just to appease a quota.
"El Psy Kongroo!" Hearthstone Moderator
At this point the Pro-GG argument is that people who position themselves actively against GG are morally suspect. In a sense that's always been the argument.Originally Posted by Nixx
I think the first post in this thread was updated at least November last year, which should give you a good idea about how it all started.
But to respond to your question; I think 'feminists', if they're that at all, should be on our side, or visa versa, since gamers are as diverse as they come, colors, genders, preferences, we're everyone, everywhere, but the backlash of suggesting corruption within the ranks of several games media, who also happened to be women and feminists, causes us to be on opposite sides right now and has us depicted as rapists and mass murderers.
Reptile tongue though.