The most peaceful countries on earth are those with the most homogenous populations.
All the most violent parts of the world are places where vastly different people are all mixed in together.
Assimilation is not only the right way, it's the only way.
I get that this is your preference; but aside from illegal activity, shouldn't it be personal choice? A native (interesting choice of words btw), doesn't even have to interact with the native population anymore than an immigrant. A healthy culture is generally something we participate in freely and shape naturally. You don't tell people who they have to interact with, and you don't mandate how they speak. Most people can't even accomplish that with their own children. The question was, if we should force or strongly encourage immigrants to assimilate, and you generally can't do that without adopting some very unbecoming cultural traits.
I see what you're trying to get at, the problem is, taking jokes out of context and being offended isn't exactly foreign to your culture or mine. Now committing violence over it usually requires some action.
Gawd yes!..............
Last edited by Nathiest; 2014-09-22 at 11:59 PM. Reason: be more pc
The way I see it, language and culture are a must. You cannot pretend to live in a country and force a stablished culture and language to accomodate to yours, you are the one who must adapt to the country that welcomes you. But, that doesn't mean you have to completely shut down your own roots, when you are at home you make use of any tradition or language you want. Plus, it differs a lot from a country to another, or places inside the same country. Some are really open-minded and won't mind most of your own culture carried by you, while others will really push you or force you to become one of them.
But in my opinion, if the inmigrant's culture/roots/whatever conflicts with the one of the his/her new country, then they must adapt or reserve it to home.
I think you should adhere to your new countries values and laws, but that doesn't mean you should forget your heritage. Learn the language, learn the laws, embrace the new culture but remember your roots.
"I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. "
- General Jack D. Ripper.
nothing wrong with this at all. I'd say as long as someone is willing to adopt the social norms, and obey the laws of their host country, they should be welcome. I also believe however that some cultures are just so different that they just wouldn't be capable of doing that very easily, if at all.
Whats irritating, is the segments of the population that don't want to adapt or intregate, and believe the culture of their native country is superior, even if they come from parts of the world that are always in upheaval and war.
If you can speak and write in the language of the country you chose to move to, as well as to understand and publicly comply with local customs. Then I have no issue with your culture and what you do on your free time, unless it involves either murder or genital mutilation of infants. Other than that, go for it, and have fun!
Absolutely agree, this is coming from someone who grew up in Miami, thankfully I've moved out of that hell hole and now live in Ohio. Most of my family are Cuban expatriates and Franco's Spain's expatriates, most of them got adjusted to life in the U.S. pretty easily. That said a lot of people I grew up with in Miami, both family and friends refuse to learn the language. I find it as annoying as anyone else who doesn't speak Spanish when I walk into a store in Miami and nobody speaks English. Even though I'm fluent in Spanish it annoys the hell out of me that some of them don't even try to learn the language. I'm not talking about some store in Little Havana either, but places like Best Buy, McDonald's or Brandsmart.
Yeah this is true as well. I lived in Buenos Aires and Mexico City for a few years and most of us Americans pretty much stuck together. There was like a U.S. embassy's clique, we would all eat BBQ's on Sunday's at the ambassadors house. Especially in Argentina where there were hardly any Americans. Almost all the American kids would go to the one American restaurant in BA, called Dallas or Kansas if I recall correctly. Admittedly we had limited options in Argentina since when I was living there (right after 9/11) things got really dangerous, especially for foreigners.
Last edited by Fullmetal89; 2014-09-23 at 03:27 AM.
"I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. "
- General Jack D. Ripper.
The Social Democrats are the ones who want to decrease labor immigration, which I find utterly idiotic. My policy is that if they want to come to Sweden, and in the case of refugees that actually managed to get to Sweden, you should get to stay. At the same time it's important that other European countries take their responsibility.
The key is good integration. Know what that word means?
- - - Updated - - -
That's 0.0004% of our population every year. It's not Sweden that's the problem, it's the rest of Europe.
- - - Updated - - -
Failing? We barely have any integration politics. With the Sweden Democrats getting 13% in Riksdagen the rest of our political parties have to start talking integration in order to halt their advance.
I love how people (men) from sweden gets banned one after one. I am assimilated myself cause i was born and raised by Swedes but the more time that passes the more i feel like i should stop being it.
Please do encourage people to assimilate. Good luck to make someone like your cold hearts.
Not saying i hate Sweden, i love the women and the nature;D
Think i will racially mix with one just for you.
Last edited by mmoc664e732ce0; 2014-09-23 at 07:41 AM.
Migrants absolutely should be encouraged to assimilate, at least to a degree. The raw truth of the matter is that some cultural elements of some countries are just plain undesirable or outright unacceptable in others. How women are treated, how conflicts are resolved, how rights are viewed, stuff like that. As an off-the-cuff example, trying to impose Shariah law in a western nation, to me, bears itself as an insult to the right to be in that country in the first place. If it comes down to a conflict of culture between a country of origin and country of residence, the country of residence should win out. I can't stress enough that this only applies to the elements of a culture that are problematic in that way, though. If they don't cause any such issue, it's no-one's business.
Also, segregation is bad, self-imposed or otherwise. The formation of ghettos isn't good for anybody.
okay so if all the refugees in the world would somehow make it to sweden it would be okay for them to receive residency permit? that's 40 million or more
someone can't do maths, 1% of the population is 94000 roughly. if you get 60000 in a year that's not 0.0004%, that's 0.7% of the population approximately
what happened with the earlier immigration waves 30-40 years ago? why did that work?
Last edited by mmocd9ea198408; 2014-09-23 at 09:57 AM.
No. But we don't meet waves with millions of people. We meet at most a few thousand.
I was speaking refugees, not immigrants in general. What's bad about a 0,7% increase?someone can't do maths, 1% of the population is 94000 roughly. if you get 60000 in a year that's not 0.0004%, that's 0.7% of the population approximately
They were simpler times when the majority of labor in Sweden was simple. Factory workers and that. Nowadays Sweden need to fill job positions that require academical or specialist experience, and not even that is certain to land some immigrants jobs even if they are engineers.what happened with the earlier immigration waves 30-40 years ago? why did that work?
What we're steering into is an issue of how to give non-academics jobs, both immigrants and youngsters, in times of recession.
a few thousand isn't 60k, that's closer to hundred thousands rather than closer to a few thousand
i was speaking about refugees according to the graph that was linked earlier which put it at 3,320 / million inhabitant for 6 months, with 9,4 million population that puts it at 62,416 for a year if that rate holds, which is 0.7% increase by asylum seekers and then you add the other types of migration and you end up well above 1% per year, don't try to play number tricks on me, it's nowhere close to 0.0004% as you claimed it to be
are you not aware of the number of people coming to your country? your country is obviously incapable of handling the rapid & high increase in population caused by the asylum seekers who have next to no education and even after 15 years they never reach an employment rate that would make them self-sufficient and not a burden on the state, you take too many in a too short time
Last edited by mmocd9ea198408; 2014-09-23 at 06:13 PM.