Let's say a John Smith won the republican nomination, and a different John Smith won the democratic nomination. What percentage of the population would screw up their vote? 10%? 30%? How screwed up would that election be?
Let's say a John Smith won the republican nomination, and a different John Smith won the democratic nomination. What percentage of the population would screw up their vote? 10%? 30%? How screwed up would that election be?
That would be much easier, not harder.
Its very likely that no candidate would win a majority of electoral votes. When that happens, the election is cancelled and the House of Representatives picks the President. The Senate picks the Vice President. That hasn't happened since 1825 though.
Florida would declare a state of emergency
One or both of them will have been in public life long enough that they most likely will have differentiated their names long before getting the nomination. Like the inclusion of middle initials (George W.), using a middle name (Mitt instead of Willard), an alternate form of their name (less or more formal), like Jack or Johnny instead of John.
There's a (R) and a (D) on ballots, as well as party emblems for people who have trouble reading. Of course, there's will still be states that have shoddily constructed ballots, like Florida, where the ballots were so confusing Pat Robertson ended up getting a bunch of Jewish votes because of how his name was placed in relation to other candidates.
Last edited by Gwiez; 2014-09-23 at 02:56 AM.
Nader strikes back.
This isn't Yahoo answers dude....
"I can no longer sit back and allow Communist infiltration, Communist indoctrination, Communist subversion and the international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids. "
- General Jack D. Ripper.
Uh, I've only voted twice but I'm fairly certain party is listed beside names of candidates.
I'd vote John Smith obviously...