I fail to see how a race to the bottom is a solution. BTW in my country defense was part of the prosecution some time ago. And trust me, you would not like it.
- - - Updated - - -
I cant believe that people like you are defending cops who were acting like a bunch of thugs, of wait I can because far too many peopel will defend the police no matter what they do and far too many people will blame them no matter the facts.
To summarize: Running over a cop and hitting a school bus: very bad, police beating a defenceless driver afterwards, also very bad.
any person found guilty of a crime should not profit in regards to compensation stemming from there actions from said crime. This includes compensation claims, royalties from books / movies based off the crimes etc.
He ran over a copper, hit a school bus and patrol car. If anything he should be paying compensation to the officer and paying off damages to the vehicles. instead though he will get $1000. which is a lot more than what the damages to the vehicles involved are. Shit makes no sense to me at all.
He got money for what he did? I don't want to live on this planet anymore!
not saying that the police are in the right, or in the wrong, That is not the issue. IF anyone breaks a law, citizen, law enforcement, military, politicians etc, then they should be punished and not rewarded.
Yes if it is true that he was attacked then there should be repercussions for the officers involved, but he should not be given cash in the way of an apology.
The man chose his lawyers, did he not?
Regardless of what side you are on, he could of killed a police officer. He's lucky he doesn't have it worse.
Alabama man! He's quick, he's strong, he's active.
No wonder the US law system is shit, it's all backwards. A lawyer is supposed to get a percentage (fee) of what the client wins after the lawsuit is over, and not the other way around.
I do. He broke the law, then led them on a high speed chase endangering countless lives, and then continued to fight with the police. He is a scumbag and shouldve been beaten more than he was. We arent talking about a random innocent person walking down the street
- - - Updated - - -
So we should just let him get away? Cool, Ill just start going out and committing crimes. I got a fast car so since they arent allowed to chase me if I drive fast, Im all good!
You really don't know how the legal system works, do you? I mean, it's super that you can comment on something you have no knowledge of, but it gets tiring after awhile.
(how do I know you don't know - because you assume all representation is based on a percentage - called a contingency fee - which wasn't the case here)
Regardless of whether he deserves anything or not, on what planet do his lawyers deserve $459,000? Yeesh.
He fell out of his car unconscious and they beat him senseless anyway
That sucks
Last edited by Bryntrollian; 2014-10-24 at 10:12 PM.
^ This.
Approach it like a series of smaller issues, and it becomes much clearer:
1. Does he deserve to be in jail for a very long time for hitting a police officer and a schoolbus? Absolutely.
2. Should the cops have run over and started beating an unconscious (possibly dead) person - even if a violent criminal? No, they're out of line.
3. Should there be a court case over the beating? Probably not - it should have been thrown out given the circumstances - and this is the most interesting part to me. The case shouldn't have occurred in the first place, and the judge likely allowed it knowing it would make his lawyer friends rich for an easy win vs. government (who clearly acted in the wrong). That the case took so long that the lawyers earned that much - suggests to me that everyone was stalling to hand the lawyers money. Further, that the award was precisely $460,000, and the lawyers fees at the end of the trial were $459,000 - suggests the criminals lawyers were communicating with the judge / police defense attorney, to end the case once the money ran out: $1000 to the criminal was a margin of error.
Now, they could have all collectively colluded like that to ensure the money wouldn't go to the criminal himself - and I empathize with not wanting to give that guy any of the money - but that's probably wishful thinking. More likely there is corruption afoot, perhaps under the guise of not wanting to give money to the criminal - but corruption nonetheless.