After the Obama administration bargained for Bowe Bergdahl’s life, the family of ISIS hostage James Foley begged the White House for the same treatment—only to be denied.
The parents of James Foley, the journalist ISIS beheaded in August, learned about the U.S. government’s attempt to rescue him about an hour before the rest of us did.The grieving parents got word from President Obama himself.
“I told Obama that Jim worked hard to get him elected,” John Foley, James’s father, told The Daily Beast. “He believed till the end his country would come and get them.”
White House spokesmen have said that there was never any intention to share with the public details of the failed rescue mission in Syria. Word of the mission began to leak out on August 20, a day after James Foley was beheaded in a gruesome and slickly produced internet video narrated by a man with a thick British accent. White House officials briefed reporters that afternoon on the failed mission.
For the Foleys, it was a tragic ending to an awful ordeal. Since their son first went missing right before Thanksgiving in 2012, Diane Foley, in particular, began a mission to find any way she could to try to get her son back alive. She pressed the White House, the FBI and the State Department for any information she could find on James. Often, she and John would tell the FBI about what they learned from other European hostages who were released this year by ISIS. The response the Foleys received was, for the most part, beyond disappointing—little more than a “pat on the head,” John said.
http://www.thedailybeast.com/article...t-our-son.html
What do you think of all of this?
There was a failed attempt to save Foley, so you can't say they didn't try to rescue him while simultaneously putting others lives' in danger. However the government wasn't willing to make a deal in the same manner as the Bergdahl situation.
While I admit that it is very different given he is military, he wandered off a base and went AWOL which led to his capture. Allegedly US soldiers were injured and or killed in the extensive search to initially find him but we still don't know the whole story. Bergdahl was an idiot who thought he'd go on a spirit quest in the middle of a warzone, and Foley was just an independent journalist trying to cover a conflict.
Bergdahl was traded for 5 taliban commanders, who more than likely will eventually join back in their jihad.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/...-who-they-are/
Either way it sadly does support even more hostages being taken in both situations, military or civilian. Although some European countries do actually pay hefty ransoms for their civilians, which is kind but foolish in my opinion, I think it's still worse in that it encourages the taking of hostages.
Back to point, do you think that military personnel that recklessly get themselves captured and civilian hostages should be treated differently? Do you think that James Foley's parents have a justified reason for being upset?