Maybe a bit tangential to topic, but yeah.
Why? Do you believe in god? an ephemeral concept that exerts power over us, pretty much the same thing.
No, No.A lot of what it's about, in particular shitawful attitudes towards victims, is pretty much indisputably true
Its about attitudes towards WOMEN.
Read it, as far as they are concerned its ONLY women that ever can be raped, Its only due to male dominance, its pretty much a totally bogus concept.
- - - Updated - - -
the 44% number cited is a inferred number from known factors that are then extrapolated.
It is quite valid.
that is to say, it conforms to basic scientific methodology and statistics.
Put simply, the figure was reached by inferring from know cases to unknown.
It extrapolated from details in known false cases, to other cases that was not know but shared those characteristics.
its problems lies in those identifying characteristics, are they the key details? after all several details are bound to correlate for different reasons, or not correlate at all. How many of those characteristics should be shared? what quantity of know true cases (that in and of it self is a complicated construct, as there are innocent people in jail) shared some of those figures?
This is all IIRC, and the full range was 25-44% and the researcher was, if memory serves, Donaldson, something.
Let's ignore how the term to begin with wasn't even coined by the people nowadays using them and originally dated back to what was happening in prisons (which they completely ignore). Victim blaming in general is the problem. It's absolutely rampant and sadly accepted in general to the extent that often times even murder victims tend to get blamed for "having provoked" their murderer or "having put themselves in danger".
If you have a problem with people putting part of the blame on victims of a crime and defending the criminal I'm completely and absolutely on your side though.
Women have brothers and fathers to protect them from bad guys. Its always been that way.
Here's a good, brief essay on these 'studies':
http://www.nationalpost.com/m/wp/blo...stent-epidemic
A study of 73 people? That's a goddamn house party, not a test group. You can't glean anything from those results save for the fact that about a third of those guys might theoretically force a woman into sex without realizing they were raping them, judging from the wording of the questions and how 13 of the original 86 couldn't produce clear enough answers to make it into the study.
Also, humorous that this farce made it to page 69 in a rape thread.