grab popcorn.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-32726099
grab popcorn.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-32726099
Prepare your F5 buttons for maximum carnage.
Are they... controversial?
MY X/Y POKEMON FRIEND CODE: 1418-7279-9541 In Game Name: Michael__
disappointing so far, going by the guardian which has the quickest feed on it.... Mostly wildlife/charity stuff
was hoping for some confirmation of the rumours he considered converting to islam and the whole "defender of the faith(s)" thing.
Doesn't seem so if I'm honest.
The numbering is slightly strange on the pages though....
https://www.gov.uk/government/upload...ed_Letters.pdf
There are some aspects of the way the govt interacts with the monarchy that are considered to hold a special kind of privilege. The Guardian are historically left leaning and republican and have hammered the freedom of information laws to get this stuff published for a long time.
http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2...k-spider-memos
A decade long campaign? Well I hope it was worth it Guardian, but if they're all as exciting as this:
You might want to save the champagne for something else.Originally Posted by BBC
If you read them whilst listening to Eminem's Stan they take on a whole new twist.
Dear Tony...
And the biggest controversy seems to be that Charles get's his letters read by Tone.
Well played Guardian, sure it was worth it.
Well they seem rather boring. They just reflect the points that Prince Charles speaks on publicly.
Unsure why the government was so against their publication.
This was totally worth it so far.
Am disappoint, was expecting they'd be written in cursive with a fancy wax seal.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
well I am guessing we will get to see a load more. The reason it is limited to those is you can only request so much in each FOI application or the size of the application is itself reason enough to reject it.