A pretty good examination of the movement. Most of them spend their time screaming about a problem and not enough time examining and solving it. It's driven by emotions instead of intelligence.
A pretty good examination of the movement. Most of them spend their time screaming about a problem and not enough time examining and solving it. It's driven by emotions instead of intelligence.
Modern gaming apologist: I once tasted diarrhea so shit is fine.
"People who alter or destroy works of art and our cultural heritage for profit or as an excercise of power, are barbarians" - George Lucas 1988
The thing is you can't FORCE someone to believe anything, there is no such thing as thought police, but there is such a thing as being aware of where a certain train of logic and reason go. Remember there is conscious and unconscious action, it's why as a SJW, I don't agree with other SJW, that believe the, well IF IT FEELS GOOD, then why not approach to things either.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
My issue with the SJW "movement" is the extremism. It's the same issue with all organized groups. There are some movements that do have some clear messages. Movements who are seeking real change, with good points being made.
But then you have keyboard warriors speaking under the banner of said group, just destroying their image. A great quote I still think holds so much truth that I saw in these forums is:
SJWs go to the very extreme. There is no middle ground. Any logical discussion terms into a pissing game of, "Who's the racist/bigot/sexist?" In the end of the day, I'm informed enough to know what groups are decent and are sending a viable message and are aware that SJWs are nothing more than basement dwellers carrying out self-fulfillment on message boards.The difference between a SJW and an activist: An activist tries to get a ramp added to a building for easier wheelchair access. The SJW tries to get the stairs removed because they might offend people who can't use them.
Nevermind I didn't read the whole argument. Not gonna post.
Nope, only proves I am not in self denial, I don't subscribe to theory you can predict based on how someone is BORN you can determine who they will be or what they will believe, BUT, You sure as FUCK can predict based on a line of thinking and ideology where some is going and likely to believe next.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
If people haven't figured out that more than half are probably just reverse-trolling trying to piss off people in a different way - you've deluded yourself.
We have faced trials and danger, threats to our world and our way of life. And yet, we persevere. We are the Horde. We will not let anything break our spirits!"
You absolutely cannot force somebody to believe something, that is true. This issue is fundamentally an illogical one that more often than not is fought irrationally. Most people recognize that racist is a bad word, calling somebody a racist is going to cause them to circle the mental wagons from an attack. Racism is also rooted in ignorance. If you could present information about why a person may be wrong when making racist comments, you are far more likely to encourage change than by hostilely attacking them. Calling somebody a racist or a bigot will not usually be constructive.
/\ Was this sarcasm? Are you sure?
|| Read it again, I'll wait.
|| The results may surprise you.
Yeah also called Fence Sitting, you are that guy that comes into every argument and says YOU are ALL fucking extreme or idiots because two sides are arguing about something passionately, but never mind the fact you seem to come from the line of thought you frankly don't really give a shit about anything or take a stand on anything so it is all a joke to you.
Never mind the issue, never mind the weight and what could be at stake ever, If guys on fire and you have two sides saying one "I think we should put him out and help him" and the other saying "well I think we should let him burn to death (Darwin)", Your approach like clock work is, YOU are BOTH CRAZY, YUK YUK YUK!
- - - Updated - - -
Nope, I am making a point, not accusing you of anything, maybe if you read and comprehended nearly as much as you made smart ass remarks, you might understand that.
Milli Vanilli, Bigger than Elvis
I was specifically using examples within the framework of social justice and trying to demonstrate that not every bad thing that happens to you is equally bad. If you were a fat black Muslim though, that would probably have been a pretty all-around bad day.
And I do think that certain names are going to be more insulting and make you feel worse than others. Being called a silly head is not nearly as hurtful as being called a dumb shit.
/\ Was this sarcasm? Are you sure?
|| Read it again, I'll wait.
|| The results may surprise you.
Nobody should consider themselves a SJW. It's a bad thing.
In means you follow hype trains of what's "good", are generally poorly informed on the reality of the situation, blindly follow anything labeled as "progressive", all the while barely doing anything to actually help any causes beyond complaining over the internet.
The biggest reasons SJWs are terrible laughing stocks is because they sit around pretending they are so righteous, pretending they are fighting for good causes, while in reality they do nothing but sit around talking about it. They make no real effort, they make no real sacrifice, they make no real contribution. They just lord over others how great they are because of their views, which they only adopt in the first place because according to the progressive side of mainstream media those views are "good".