Obviously people do think it is important. The existence of other similar instances does not mean that this is not an issue.
I suggest that you bring light upon the topic you're referring to in an individual thread rather than attempting to hijack this one to push an agenda and deflect outrage from one source onto another.
It would be odd and questionable if there was evidence to support the notion that the OP had this particular knowledge. As people we are not in possession of every single nugget of data. Personally, I was not aware of such a named building, however I was aware (from reading this thread) of the actions of this lady. Which is why it is specifically condemned. The other instance would be condemned too, but its mere existence does not stop this mural being as people have commented, an outrage.
Last edited by mmoc828371db61; 2015-05-19 at 12:51 PM.
Where did I say anything about her being her superior?
Still, critique between staff of an university should stay between the staff in the frist instance, and only when all inside options are exhausted should it be posted somewhere on the web. It is quite understandable that the university is not amused when one part of member staff attacks another member in a public setting where the attacked is at an disadvantage simply due to the kind of setting it is (a blog) or even worse unaware of it.