Originally Posted by
Stormdash
The man is nothing if not a cross between Kramer and Homer Simpson, depending on when you catch him. The "D" by his name mostly shields him from consequences for his inanity, not to mention his soft bigotry against both his boss and Indian citizens of his own state. Running him if nothing else would forfeit any intellectual credibility to accusing GOP candidates of being "unserious".
As long as personal and professional ethics are not of importance in a President, impeccable, sure. But those old enough and/or engaged enough to remember Whitewater and Jim McDougal and the Rose Law Firm and her penchant for document destruction/disappearance know who she is. As for her success record... is there any part of American foreign policy that didn't come unglued under her tenure? The comical "Russian reset"? Cheerleading the "Arab Spring" which has given way to failed states, mass exodus of Christians, Jews, and others from North Africa and the Middle East to escape genocide and tyranny? The US barely merits a phone call anymore when the world's serious leaders need to work stuff out. She can blame that on her boss (who was this week reduced to cold-calling European leaders about Greece since none of them had cared or asked for his opinion), but that makes it hard to run against Joe.
As long as (most of) the tradiitional press continues to enable her with total non-scrutiny for political reasons, specific ice cream flavors are probably the best you can hope for.
She is not her husband. She cannot speak like him, can't affect compassion and interest like him. When she goes "big" or for soaring and passionate it's just shrill and cloying. Seriously, the Dean Scream is like her own speaking voice anytime she tries to really work the crowd.