Scorpions cover is child porn

[Sorrior]

That incident I was refering to that made the newspapers did concern certain immigrant groups that started making it an issue, I do not doubt however that in the Dutch bible belt you can find people that agree. But they are being drowned by the voices of reason.

A funny thing with the US I noticed after years of working with Americans and visiting a few times: Most Americans I came into contact through work and in major cities find the situation in the US (forbidden words on TV, boobphobia and sexualizing everything nude) horrible. But in more rural areas this was completely opposite. (And all of Alaska I visited) The people are as polarized as the politics over there. And unfortunately it seems like the most restrictive group gets it's way because politicians are afraid to offend and noone gets offended by not doing anything.

I'm an Alaskan who is definitely against all our insane censorship

[Evil Midnight Bomber]

Basically, some countries don't have a specific "sexual intent" section of their child pornography laws so that they can use discretion a little more in prosecution of people who are a more apt at squeezing their way through loopholes. Just because it was considered illegal for this guy to possess doesn't mean it's illegal for everyone. If he didn't have thousands of other images of nude children it wouldn't be an issue. The same way it's not illegal to have nude pictures of your own children or nudist colonies but if someone is found with 5000 pictures of them, they're able to prosecute based on the motive for owning the pictures rather than the content of the pictures themselves.

It's not inherently risk free, since it assumes judges will always act fairly, but I've never heard of someone being convicted on isolated instances of naked children.

I'm starting to think people didn't actually read the story.

He was only charged for child porn for the other images. He wasn't charged for the scorpions cover...

[Deleted]

I'm starting to think people didn't actually read the story.

He was only charged for child porn for the other images. He wasn't charged for the scorpions cover...

People on MMO-C not reading a story!? Whatever next

[Deleted]

It cant possibly be child porn to own the cd.

However maybe they should search out the people who made the cower in the first place. have a talk with them

[Evil Midnight Bomber]

It cant possibly be child porn to own the cd.

However maybe they should search out the people who made the cower in the first place. have a talk with them

And he isn't being charged for owning the album...
What the swedish ruling says is that the image itself, lacking any context, does violate their child pornography laws.

[Mistame]

I thought the context of the thread was

The context of the was the part you left out:

Would you say it is child porn?