I may not want to admit who could have done a better job? First of all, it's not an admission, it's an assertion. And I asserted it on this very page.
The entirety of my opposition to this deal is based on objectivity. You're the one who attempted to paint me as a partisan in order to dismiss them. Again, here are my objections, and they are non partisan.
A deal that makes Iran richer and stronger would be fine, if that deal kept ballistic missile technology out of their hands for the duration of the deal, like the Chairman of the Joint Chiefs advised. A deal that makes Iran richer and stronger would be fine, if it had a mechanism for effectively snapping back every single one of the international sanctions that existed previously. A deal that makes Iran richer and stronger would be fine if it prohibited them from any indigenous enrichment program like multiple previous UNSC resolutions stipulated.
A deal that makes Iran richer and stronger would be fine, if it included anytime, anywhere access to inspectors like Obama's national security adviser promised it would.