This again... Sorry i have to tell you that blunt - but that is incredibly stupid. IS has (sadly) enough supporters in the EU. Even if they wanted to import terrorists, why with all the refugees? Look at the EU right now, the rules change every day (Germany, Austria opens borders; the next day germany closes the border, a day later austria). No one can predict where refugees end up. They cannot take any euqipment with them. So why in hell would the try it? Of course they say they do, but... you know how terror works? Fear.
View her as every other leader / politician screaming that the doors should be opened full throttle, like a raving irresponsible nutbag!!
It's easy for politicians to be big and welcoming at the expense of normal citizens, since they won't ever feel the issues associated with inviting indiscriminately, let me stress I'm all for helping actual refugees, but unlike the political landscape that is afraid of being labeled racist;
Many of the people flooding into Europe these days are not refugees, they just seek the easy benefits. If safety for their children / family was all they were after, they would have no issues with being registered in the first Eu country they arrive at.., yet a majority of them are seeking towards Germany / France / United Kingdom / Sweden (Denmark also used to be a favorite destination for them until benefits was sliced by over 50%).
What the Eu is doing these days, is a political and financial suicide if it's left to continue, I don't care what "block" you may see yourself as part of.., but you can't accept half the middle east when there's only a fraction of them willing to integrate themselves and leave behind the caveman mentality.
When some nations are starting to struggle with caring for even the poorest of their native people, what sort of outcome do they expect with the current scenario?
With luck, this will be the death of the EU as we know it today and sovereignty can return to the individual states again instead of a few deranged elites!
Mixture of no comment and tyrant.
Voted Tyrant merely because SENSATIONALISM IS THE NEW BLACK.
On a slightly more serious note, she seems obsessed with restoring Germany's name, at whatever cost, and that is bad policy.
She seems competent to me.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
Tyrannt. She is ironically fueling nationalists (real ones) while she thinks she is pushing her agenda with immigration. Even if the nationalists never come to power, her own people (native germans) are still fucked up to their necks anyways.
When she declared that Germany will take on unlimited refugees without consulting any other EU nations or even the German people she made the shift to tyrant in my view. In recent years she has basically become the de facto supreme leader of the European Union.
I think she's neither, just an misguided idiot.
I am the lucid dream
Uulwi ifis halahs gag erh'ongg w'ssh
I liked Merkel before. But it seems to me like she's making some very bad decisions - at least for the short term.
She's going for Nobel prize for humanitarian efforts, doesn't care about citizens of her own country or any neighboring countries.
Voted for tyrant.
She's trying to be a savior, but the law of unintended consequences is going to kick in, and her actions will later be deemed negative (although not tyrannical). The problem is, these consequences should have been very evident. Which makes her either ignorant, or emotional...
Umm, certainly not, Schröder was the guy who turned Germany neoliberal, destroyed classic socialdemocracy and made use of revolving doors so he can smoke cigars in a leather chair high up some Gazprom ivory tower. Merkel was born in Hamburg. She's also been politician the entirety of her life. She was a former FDJ agitprop leader. You do not become that without a certain mindset. After the Fall of the Wall she was in a sauna drinking beer thinking nothing of what happens outside since she was believing it would fail to have any effect. Well, then suddenly she made a political turnaround and got under tutelage of Kohl. For a person like her it does not matter what ideology you are following, the most important is that you do follow one if possible at the highest office possible. In that sense her political heritage coming from her parent's home has probably played more of a role than her origin. That West-German politicians too can be a wellspring of absurd and dark-humoured politics can be seen on the example of Flintenuschi aka Zensursula.
WoW: Crowcloak (Druid) & Neesheya (Paladin) @ Sylvanas EU (/ˈkaZHo͞oəl/) | GW2: Siqqa (Asura Engineer) @ Piken Square EU
If builders built houses the way programmers built programs,the first woodpecker to come along would destroy civilization. - Weinberg's 2nd law
He seeks them here, he seeks them there, he seeks those lupins everywhere!
I may agree with Merkel on somethings and like how she changes her ways to try to make the majority happy.
I do not like however how she keeps bending to Eastern Europe on everything. From Sanctions on Russia one of our biggest trading partners, or how she keeps giving them Handouts at the expense of the German Taxpayer. I personally wish she would grow a spine regarding foreigners. Especially when it came to the NSA spying.
up her skirt when she's not looking
Risk isn't 100% that something bad will happen. I'll side with 100% chance tho help a few people than an unknown/0% chance that something bad could happen.
But as an American, I honestly can't say much because I have no idea the impact the influx is having on Germany.
There's an important nugget in the midst of your sarcasm: when you invite massive changes to society, you risk ending up with wild negative consequences, expected as well as unexpected.
- - - Updated - - -
That 0% of something bad happening is much greater, by definition more than zero since knowledge isn't perfect and human actions aren't 100% predictable. Then factor in cultural differences, etc...