I don't have children myself and not planning to for a while, still way too young for that. But I wouldn't want to imagine if these refugees would attack or even rape my kids, if I was that rich I would've done the same. Not saying that all refugees are like that, but its a case of ''1 or more guys ruin it for all the others'' just like we learned at school. People may call me racist, xenophobic or whatever (in the end its just extreme left-wings, so who cares), but I'd gladly take those titles if it means that my children are save. All that the news shows is violence and rape what these refugees do, hell there's a 700% increased amount of rape in Sweden when they took in immigrants. And then there's news about refugees raping others in asylumcenters.
And it's only going to get worse if we don't help the ones that want to escape their tyranny. The West is a bastion of freedom for these people, their own government literally uses gas-attacks on them on one side and ISIS kills them indescriminantly if they're not their special snowflake flair of Islam, and on top of that their only way out has people that wants to throw them back into the ocean if they could.
And then people are surprised why people there get radicalised.
Edit: Another thing that we could do instead of being a fucking doormat for the outcasts is to help people like the YPG to destroy ISIS on the ground, while destroying the shit out of them with air strikes, it helped immensely in Iraq.
It's just that Assad is a whole other monster on his own, and allied with russia that we're not doing it.
Last edited by Pickwickman; 2015-09-27 at 05:04 PM.
Can't really blame them.
_______________
I would also buy an "Island"... in the middle of the pacific.
"Prejudice" the "Jud" part comes from the word Judge.
The reluctance to accept refugees from a war torn country doesn't require any pre-judgement. Because either A: Those people need to find work to support themselves once they've been processed, which tips the labour negotiating scales in favor of employers due to the influx of employees, or B: They don't work, and have to be supported with tax dollars.
No prejudgement is required. No prejudice. Just SJW bullshit cuddly woowoo mumsy wumsy crap that is completely naive and ignores common sense.
Last edited by Gheld; 2015-09-27 at 05:14 PM.
Thats because house owner on a forum on MMO-CHAMP is likely a minority. Hell most of them dont even stop to think what this does to the POOR citizen in the same city. Devaluation of high income houses reduce the taxes the city gets. City has to dial them up, which means the rich are poorers and pay more and the poor stays poor but pay more. Even if you are in an apartment this hurts you, because the owner will bill you the increase in taxes in your next year contract, on top of the general increase. Nobody ever has to gain from housing devaluation, except richer people that wants to buy, except if this is a long term plan, then even the buyers dont want it, because the value has to increase not keep decreasing.
The alternative of not increasing municipal taxes is well not better. You guys hate when your streets are all fucking broken and stuff?
Last edited by minteK917; 2015-09-27 at 05:25 PM.
It's just a very stupid decision of that regional government to try and put it there anyway. Refugee camps, much like rehabilitation centres are more often put near industrial areas further away from regular housing areas to stop devalueing those buildings.
A bunch of atypical people in the neighbourhood fucks it up economically pretty much always.
If they spent $600,000 on arming a militant group, it would go MUCH further towards ending the escalating situation; for $600,000 you could probably convince 15-20 disgruntled, ex-military types to physically remove these people from your area.