Well when you take the combined medicare, medicaid, health subsidies, health and human services, etc., budget of the US government, upwards of $800,000,000,000 to $1,000,000,000,000... And are negotiating on behalf of 320,000,000 people... You can probably get a pretty substantially better deal compared to a 6,600,000 person subset of that which operates on an already meager budget that constantly gets cut even more...
clear cut evidence that we MUST move to a true public healthcare system. the for profit system is broken beyond repair
Every other developed country in the world are running a successful system that is miles and miles better than the disaster we have with for profit system in USA. really that will be very easy to fix if thats all you are concerned about. really easy fix just copy and paste and voila we got something that is like a thousand times better for EVERYONE.
- - - Updated - - -
Thats why public healthcare is better and more affordable for everyone.
Well the money is already being thrown at it. Only it is done so about as inefficiently as possible.
The US spends about $4 trillion on medical expenses annually... The government is already paying about 25% of that (~60% medicare, ~40% medicaid). You don't think a single party negotiating on behalf of everyone can get a better deal on that other 75%?
Hell a better deal on the 25% too since the prices of the 75% influence, if not outright determine the cost of what the government is already paying.
and we aren't like every other nation out there and why almost every other nation looks up to and tries emulate us or immigrate here
we have become one of the greatest nations ever it wasn't because we tried to be like other nations
If I want America to be like every other nation I would move to any of those other nations
and I have heard the bull crap that other nations health care is better and that is bull shit because they are judging accessibility and affordability as the matrix not results the survival rates for things like cancer and heart dieses is much higher in the US then places with socialized medicine
It is like claiming the old VW beetle is the best car because it was cheap and accessible
Last edited by Vyxn; 2015-11-19 at 11:21 PM.
So what do we throw at doctors to get them to see veterans, instead of money?
How would you propose we digitize the VA logs, aside from hiring people to enter them on computers?
If you have some friends that would be willing to do stuff for the VA for free then you need to tell them to get on it.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
The US does not have to become like every other nation. Some things they do do better however, and one of those is healthcare. Don't you think it's mighty dumb to consciously choose to have the worst developed world healthcare system in the world?
P.S. Appealing to American exceptionalism doesn't win you arguments.
That's not really true brother, the VA is generally supported by both parties (internal squabbling aside), but run very inefficiently, just because the gov't runs something doesn't mean that its going to be successful. There is no economic incentive for the gov't to run things effectively, and when there is, top management officials lie or fabricate information to get bonuses (as is the case at the Phoenix VA, the VA I go to) while patients go without care.
If the gov't can't be trusted to run the single payer system in place, why would it be a good idea to run it on a national scale?
- - - Updated - - -
Throwing money at a problem doesn't necessarily fix it.
Why is it run inefficiently though? Americans are no more or less efficient than anyone else in the West, so is the problem political? Lack of oversight? Lack of people in power caring about how it's run? Why haven't they headhunted someone with experience of nationalised healthcare to run it?