Quite a lot of shock/outrage in Sweden about a judge who decided to reduce the sentence of a rapist from 4 1/2 years to 3 1/2 years and also reduced the compensation to be paid to the victim.
Last March a woman was raped by two men in a car. One of the men was later caught and arrested in Norway, the other is still on the loose in europe somewhere. The man who was caught was sentenced to 4 1/2 years and it was decided that he had committed a Grov Våldtäkt. In Sweden there's different sentencing for rape and a more violent kind of rape which is known as a Grov Våldtäkt. A normal rape carries a sentence of 2-6 years whereas for the more violent kind it's 4-10 years. Group/gang rapes fall under the Grov Våldtäkt category so this guy was sentenced to 4 1/2 years in prison but a judge has now decided that because the men left the car while the other raped and didn't help each other during the act it can't be considered a group rape, and he has therefore reduced the sentence.
A rough translation of the law is
In assessing whether the offense is a Grov Våldtäkt, it should be considered if there is violence or a threat of a particularly serious nature or if more than one person assaulted the victim or otherwise participated in the assault.
So what do you think? Does two men conspiring to rape someone not constitute a group rape if they decide to give each other some privacy during the act?
Links to articles about the incident and subsequent changing of the sentence, but they're in Swedish.
http://www.expressen.se/gt/doms-till...utal-valdtakt/
http://www.aftonbladet.se/nyheter/br...cle22444033.ab