The people who founded the first University, where did they study at? Which university?
Beveling that MIT provides some kind of education that cannot be acquired elsewhere is sillier. Education is knowledge, MIT doesn't have the monopoly on knowledge. Not to mention that in scientific circles the knowledge is freely shared as such is the requirement of scientific method, it's called peer review. And science doesn't need no echo chambers. It's all available to the public too.
The primal purpose of a university is NOT giving education. It's actually scientific work. Hence why uni ranking is based on SCIENTIFIC WORK.
Education is a form of earning money to pay for said scientific work. (Also it is used to grow fresh scientists.)
Hence it should not be that weird that the uni reputation among soon to be students and employers is VERY important to attract the most (more money) and the best (recruits for science) students.
The guy who stays in the uni to become a scientist has 1000000000000% better education than ANY other graduate.