Why is it only ever bad if White people are nationalist?
You are allowed black countries, asian countries, but say a White country and suddenly its "OMFG YOU GUYS NEED MULTICULTRALISMS!!!"
It is fucking stupid double standards on the world.
Why is it only ever bad if White people are nationalist?
You are allowed black countries, asian countries, but say a White country and suddenly its "OMFG YOU GUYS NEED MULTICULTRALISMS!!!"
It is fucking stupid double standards on the world.
To be honest, this whole concept of black (and white) unity is quite annoying. Being mulatto I get caught up in this bullshit all the time, simply for either being mixed. A lot of black nationals want to people like me to ignore my non-African ancestry and act like a ghetto, redneck so they can feel comfortable with me. White nationalists want people like me to act similar so they can justify trying to seperate themselves from us.
Idiots all of them.
- - - Updated - - -
What double standard realistically exists? Nobody is stopping you from moving to Somalia, Kenya, Equatorial Guinea or Chad and living your beautiful days there. Plenty of Europeans live in Japan, Hong Kong, Macua, Shanghai and South Korea, many stay in Singapore and Dubai and Abu Dhabi and Mexico.
Also multiple ethnic groups living in a country doesn't equal multiculturalism.
Because white nationalism is synonymous with white supremacy...But you already knew that, didn't you?
You're mixing up patriotism which is perfectly acceptable with what nationalism is right now which is like I said racism.
Which white countries are you talking about?
I've been to Poland and Ireland, they're both very 'white'.
So is most of Eastern Europe and Russia.
USA, Canada and Australia had brown and black natives living in those countries long before Europeans arrived lest you forget the indigeonous people which you killed, pillaged and raped to realise your manifest destiny!!! Thailand has many Western expats living there, many Brits live and work in the Middle East, like in Dubai.
Japan has boosted immigration in recent years, many Filipinos and Vietnamese live there, as do Westerners. Japan can't take too many immigrants due to high population density, which is higher than that of the UK. If you count the US military occupation of the Okinawan prefecture - and it is an occupation because the majority of the locals want the Yanks to go home, you could argue a lot of Americans live there.
There's no agenda behind most of it, just plain old economics. The EU, US, Canada and Australia enjoy a high standard of living, good salaries, decent working conditions, and a stable infrastructure which is a 'pull' factor when it comes to immigration.
Who wants to live in totalitarian China with a state censored internet and work long hours for the equivalent of less than £200 a month?
If by plenty you mean a few thousand then sure. Like 0.09% of the population are permanent foreign expats in these countries.
They are better off for it too generally. Letting in immigrants for skilled labor is the only real reason any country should let them in nowadays.
To be honest the only borderline "totalitarians" I see are the ultra leftists who want the government to limit free speech and ban or disrupt anything that doesn't gel with the leftist world view.
Most of the right wing is made up of moderates like Trump and Cruz supporters with only a very very small number of ultra right wingers. Meanwhile if you look at the Bernie campaign you can see the full extent the the fanatical ultra-left with the huge mobs he can mobilise to disrupt any right leaning rally.
Last edited by Kuntantee; 2016-03-28 at 01:21 PM.
All nationalists are totalitarian. It's because it comes from collective thought and that is always authoritarian. People are individuals and if you start treating them like groups they oppose it. Therefor, collectivist turn to all forms of control methods in order to negate individual freedoms which oppose their ideology.
Being an individual mean you are resposible for youself. Being part of the group make that into shared responsibility. Group think brings the feeling of safety, however, it costs your individuality.