Originally Posted by
EventHorizon
You are aware that sexuality, eroticism and pornography aren't the same thing and only related to each other, right?
There is a distinction between full-on porn and a tight body suit. You're basically generalizing and saying no sexy thing can be anything but porn which is a very archaic and regressive way of seeing sexuality, on top of being a fallacy.
Sexuality as a trait and not a focus is realistic, because believe it or not, people can like sexy things or sexuality without being total pervs, it is a very real part of what makes us humans. You can find a man/woman attractive without instantly going for the "gonna get inside of her" perspective. But I'm sorry that your apparently lacklustre comprehension of that thing you're so adamant on talking about is making you say silly things. The main problem with many aspects of current pop-culture is that sex is used in demeaning, controlling or marketing manners, not as something that humanity should see as what it really is: a part of us as a species.
While I think many of you became saltier than the Dead Sea over this rather trivial matter, the OP could have turned into a very interesting conversation without the involvement of the less emotionally balanced posters. It's made very obvious that neither side - omitting certain specific individuals - can and welcomes any form of debate, more so they strive to perpetuate and enlarge their echo chamber built upon hyperbole and name calling. Both of you radical bunch of cutes are why we can't have nice things - but please, keep thinking it's all because of the other side.
Edit: Also, quick note, are you saying that whenever you go to a gym and some women wear tight leggings that it's tantamount to starring in your own porn movie?