This is horrible news. Playing on that server was a phenomenal experience, but I knew sooner or later blizz would lay down the law, so I stopped leveling my shammy there...
From what was posted earlier in the thread, I can only assume that blizz couldn't shut the server down, but then they got wind of the donations being made by players. IIRC, that vanilla server started out with its creators funding the whole project. Obviously, that didn't last forever, and once they started taking donations, they started digging their own graves.
No doubt in my mind that blizz will eventually create classic servers, but the problem is waiting for that to happen...
Oh yes, how can someone be so foolish to enjoy cosmetic content in an MMORPG. I don't have a female gnome with spiked hair though, she's a rogue in T9 with black hair and goggles. Just one of all the Horde and Alliance chars I have. ^^
Do tell, what can one do in Classic that can't be done now? Or rather, do tell how it matters MORE than what can be done now, since this is a common claim I see.
Last edited by Queen of Hamsters; 2016-04-07 at 01:01 AM.
I'll look into it then. I did a 5 second Google and only saw the one PDF document, which is unusual. I should be able to pull up the filling so I can get a better understanding of the actual suit. If you ping me tomorrow, I should have an answer for you (and a link to the court case itself, which will settle that matter).. otherwise, there's a small chance I'll forget which person I was talking to and forget.
Again, this is idiotic logic as they (Blizzard) simply would/could put up those servers of their own if there really was such a demand - couldn't they? They're clearly not doing them for a reason, and I'm doubting it's because of being "threatened" by anybody.
Also, lets face another truth - the only reason those servers get any attention is because they're free - and you damn well know it. If normal WoW became just as free, the vast majority of those people would leave those servers and play WoW instead.
I am both the Lady of Dusk, Vheliana Nightwing & Dark Priestess of Lust, Loreleî Legace!
~~ ~~
<3 ~ I am also the ever-enticing leader of <The Coven of Dusk Desires> on Moon Guard!
A crossfitter, a vegan, an atheist, and a vanilla WoW player all walked into a bar. I know because they all told me within 3 minutes.
World of Warcraft: Dying on MMO Champion since 2004
Pre-Alpha WoW tester since 2002.
How many people would pay 15 dollars a month to play on vanilla servers for more than the first two months?
Not very many.
You complain about content gaps being bad now and balance being out of whack. And yet... oh, an effective content gap that never ends with balance and bug issues that will never be addressed? Why, that's just heaven!
You think LFR queue times are bad? What happens when you can't scrape up 40 people out of trade chat to do Molten Core?
I mean at least have some consistency in your whining.
“Do not lose time on daily trivialities. Do not dwell on petty detail. For all of these things melt away and drift apart within the obscure traffic of time. Live well and live broadly. You are alive and living now. Now is the envy of all of the dead.” ~ Emily3, World of Tomorrow
Words to live by.
Peace is a lie. There is only passion. Through passion I gain strength. Through strength I gain power.
Through power I gain victory. Through victory my chains are broken. The Force shall set me free.
–The Sith Code
Just goes to show how threatened Blizzard is of Classic Servers and their popularity. I hope this sets off a chain of events that leads to them caving (as usual) about their stance on Legacy servers. Classic servers are imminent, anyways.
Ah, here we go:
"Winning the case was made easy by the fact that Alyson Reeves, owner of Scapegaming, didn’t even bother turning up for the hearing. So by default Blizzard won."
http://www.geek.com/games/blizzard-w...rvers-1277800/
You can't just NOT show up to court.
I'm passionate about it because i used to play them constantly and ran one for a few of my friends. Everyone in the private server emu community knew the risks when you ran one, the more popular it became the more attention it got and once you start making money off of it there was a good chance you would be shut down. The Donate for Items was a big thing at first but died down when WoWscape took the plunge. Blizzard has full rights to take down the server and the owners were smart to do so (From most likely a Cease and Desist letter). Not that this matter there are hundreds of servers out there, just need to find a new one to play.
Biggest mistake they ever made.
Alright, so again, apologies I'm not a lawyer or copyright expert. My knowledge is limited. But I'd like to try and counter a few of your points.
And to be fair, no fair use or copyright law is ever 100% aligned based on what you can glean from the situation. As in, its determined within the courts what it constitutes.
That said, let's look at the four factors of fair use.
The whole, purpose and transformation of the work, is typically the most emphasized within the court. It deals with what has been explicitly copied upon, or what has otherwise been transformed and if any value was added to the original through new work added unto it. In this case, code is about the only thing that would appear different. The art assets, sound, quests, dialogue, etc, are also explicitly copied, and thus form a weak purpose factor, and is not being used for education etc as to exempt it.
Then you move onto the nature of it. I have no clue about this tbh, as its largely decided within the courts on a case by case as far as I'm aware.
Then you move onto how much of the work has been copied. In this case; a lot. Basically everything but code, such as art assets, sound assets, and more. As can be probably guessed, the more that is copied, the less chance that fair use can be incited.
Finally, you get to the point a few others on here are making in that "its taking customers away from their properties".
Which is whatever effect that Nostralius has on the market, or potential market if it did not exist would occur. If it reduces the copyright owner, Blizzard, of any reasonable expectation of profit or a reduction in a potential new market that the copyrighted work can exist in, it would have a weak case in fair use. The argument "well, blizzard won't make private servers anyway, so why can't these guys and nost do it", is void, because it is based on whatever potential exists for the market, and to the owner of the copyright.
Again, I'm no expert on this, and most of this stuff is decided within the courts themselves.
I was a GM on Novus Opiate when it *first* started and helped in its creation. We all knew the risks but we also knew we were going into legally gray territory.
This conversation reminds me of this: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sony_C...y_Studios,_Inc.
Of unique interest: "Children's television personality Mr. Rogers' testimony supporting the manufacturers of VCRs before the District Court was taken into consideration for the decision. The Court stated that his views were a notable piece of evidence "that many [television] producers are willing to allow private time-shifting to continue" and even quoted his testimony in a footnote."