Charles Krauthammer on Hillary Clinton
Recently, Charles Krauthammer alluded that he had
no doubt some of the 30k emails Hillary deleted from
her private email server very likely had references to
the Clinton Foundation, which would be illegal and a
conflict of interest.
The Clinton Foundation is "organized crime" at its finest,
and we are financing it.
Here is a good, concise summary of how the Clinton
Foundation works as a tax free international money
laundering scheme. It may eventually prove to be the
largest political criminal enterprise in U.S. history.
This is a textbook case on how you hide foreign money
sent to you and repackage it to be used for your own
purposes. All tax free. Here's how it works:
1. You create a separate foreign "charity." In this
case one in Canada.
2. Foreign oligarchs and governments, then donate
To this Canadian charity. In this case, over 1,000 did
Contributing mega millions. I'm sure they did this out
of the goodness of their hearts, and expected nothing
In return. (Imagine Putin's buddies waking up one
morning and just deciding to send untold millions to a
Canadian charity).
3. The Canadian charity then bundles these separate
donations and makes a massive donation to the Clinton Foundation.
4. The Clinton Foundation and the cooperating Canadian
charity claim Canadian law prohibits the identification
of individual donors.
5. The Clinton Foundation then "spends" some of this
money for legitimate good works programs. Unfortunately,
experts believe this is on the order of 10%. Much of the
balance goes to enrich the Clinton's, pay salaries To
untold numbers of hangers on, and fund lavish travel,
etc. Again, virtually all tax free, which means you and
I are subsidizing it.
6. The Clinton Foundation, with access to the world's
best accountants, somehow fails to report much of this
on their tax filings. They discover these "clerical errors"
and begin the process of re-filing 5 years of tax returns.
7. Net result--foreign money, much of it from other
countries, goes into the Clinton's pockets tax free and
untraceable back to the original donor. This is the
textbook definition of money laundering.
Oh, by the way, the Canadian "charity" includes as a
principal one Frank Giustra. Google him. He is the guy
who was central to the formation of Uranium One, the
Canadian company that somehow acquired massive U.S. uranium interests
and then sold them to an organization controlled by Russia. This transaction
required U.S. State Department approval, and guess who was Secretary of
State when the approval was granted. As an aside,
imagine how former Virginia Governor Bob McDonnell
feels. That poor schlep is in jail because he and his wife
took $165,000 in gifts and loans for doing minor favors
for a guy promoting a vitamin company. Not legal but
not exactly putting U.S. security at risk.
Sarcasm aside, if you're still not persuaded this was a
cleverly structured way to get unidentified foreign
money to the Clinton's, ask yourself this:
Why did these foreign interests funnel money through
a Canadian charity? Why not donate directly to the
Clinton Foundation? Better yet, why not donate money
directly to the people, organizations and countries in
need?
This is the essence of money laundering and influence
peddling.Talk about devious minds
Now you know why Hillary's destruction of 30,000
e-mails was a risk she was willing to take.
Pretty good summary of money laundering 21st century
style. Organized crime does the same things with
legitimate businesses. They don't care if the business
looses money, they make millions. The Clinton's don't
mind spending 10% or so on real charity work, but the
remaining 90% well you know where that goes. Just think,
your daughter graduates from college, marries into a family
whose father had been in Federal jails for fraud and other monetary
crimes and is pardoned by then President Clinton. Chelsea has a
$5 Million wedding, works for a television
network for an excessive $300K. Now 3 years later
purchase a $10 Million apartment in New York City. How
does that happen?
Bill and Hillary are devious, unprincipled, dishonest
and criminal, and they are Slick! Warning: They could
be back in the White House in January 2017.
As with most criminals, they begin with small amounts
of theft or embezzlement and then, when they escape punishment,
it emboldens them and the money and other
crimes get larger. All one needs to know is follow the
money and you will see the Clintons at the end.