Page 1 of 4
1
2
3
... LastLast
  1. #1

    69 class 1 misdemanor and 1 class 4 felony for a ''prank''....

    http://www.cbsnews.com/news/arizona-...earbook-photo/

    I'm not sure of who had the brightest idea, the dude or the prosecutor....

  2. #2
    The Unstoppable Force Belize's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Mar 2010
    Location
    Gen-OT College of Shitposting
    Posts
    21,942
    Hahahahahahaha.

  3. #3
    Seems a little harsh for some god-mode yearbook trolling.

  4. #4
    That this photo got past not just the football program editing process but also the yearbook editing process is quite something.

  5. #5
    Banned monkmastaeq's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Frozen wasteland
    Posts
    903
    I can't wait until we get to the point where they cut off our arms and legs and rip out our tongues so we can never offend anyone

  6. #6
    It takes balls to do that

  7. #7
    Quote Originally Posted by monkmastaeq View Post
    I can't wait until we get to the point where they cut off our arms and legs and rip out our tongues so we can never offend anyone
    It's very obvious that the ones pushing for this conviction are the usual ''SJW', right ?

  8. #8
    Mechagnome Betelgeuse's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    The middle of the desert
    Posts
    577
    Just another case of people taking themselves waaaay too seriously. Flashing your junk at people in creative ways should be an Olympic sport.
    Quote Originally Posted by Xekus View Post
    Yes, she would destroy me and my raging boner.
    In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government IS the problem.

  9. #9
    Deleted
    Seem excessive.

  10. #10
    Titan I Push Buttons's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2013
    Location
    Cincinnati, Ohio
    Posts
    11,244
    Wow that's pretty absurd.

    School should have told him to apologize and maybe given him a suspension... Fucking criminal charges? Really?

  11. #11
    The Normal Kasierith's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    St Petersburg
    Posts
    18,464
    I'm confused as to how the school is not the one being charged, as they took the picture, reviewed it, edited it, published it, and distributed it. There's really no grounds for charging him with indecent exposure that doesn't bring far more serious charges to the school, and in court the defense is going to slam that so hard that the school can either back off or be torn down.

  12. #12
    Banned monkmastaeq's Avatar
    7+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Apr 2016
    Location
    Frozen wasteland
    Posts
    903
    Quote Originally Posted by sarahtasher View Post
    It's very obvious that the ones pushing for this conviction are the usual ''SJW', right ?
    No , i understand the law is the law and all that but it was just a dumb prank and this poor kids gonna be put through the ringer for it when he deserves a slap on the wrist.

  13. #13
    Mechagnome Betelgeuse's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    The middle of the desert
    Posts
    577
    Quote Originally Posted by sarahtasher View Post
    It's very obvious that the ones pushing for this conviction are the usual ''SJW', right ?
    I believe he is referring to Big Brother. You don't have to take everything out of context just to create conversation, right?
    Quote Originally Posted by Xekus View Post
    Yes, she would destroy me and my raging boner.
    In this present crisis, government is not the solution to our problem; government IS the problem.

  14. #14
    The Insane Underverse's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    May 2012
    Location
    The Underverse
    Posts
    16,333
    Beyond excessive. At most, he deserves a slap on the wrists. At most. But honestly, who gives a shit? Humans aren't born with clothes. This is just more evidence that we have yet to move past our puritan heritage.

  15. #15
    Deleted
    Sure, ruin his life. That's what everybody needs.

  16. #16
    Quote Originally Posted by Kasierith View Post
    I'm confused as to how the school is not the one being charged, as they took the picture, reviewed it, edited it, published it, and distributed it. There's really no grounds for charging him with indecent exposure that doesn't bring far more serious charges to the school, and in court the defense is going to slam that so hard that the school can either back off or be torn down.
    Going by the usual system they should be charging all of the news viewers for possession of child pornography.

  17. #17
    How the flying fuck did that get past the editing room?

    Shit give the charges to the idiots that can't spot a penis.

  18. #18
    What's important is that we stop this delinquent now before he starts a YouTube prank channel.

    The second "it's ju..." passes his lips he needs beating until he can no longer speak.

    Quote Originally Posted by Gheld View Post
    Going by the usual system they should be charging all of the news viewers for possession of child pornography.
    He's not a child, he's 19. Although I suppose at a push you could maybe justify that the presence of minors near his exposed member would make it sexual content involving minors. I'm not sure where the rules stand on that. Would they need to be looking at it for it to count? What if balls aren't touching? Is it nonce material then?
    Last edited by klogaroth; 2016-05-03 at 11:07 PM.

  19. #19
    The Normal Kasierith's Avatar
    10+ Year Old Account
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    St Petersburg
    Posts
    18,464
    Quote Originally Posted by Gheld View Post
    Going by the usual system they should be charging all of the news viewers for possession of child pornography.
    The overwhelming precedent based on existing trials is that people who receive child pornography without having any intent to do so (such as if someone sends you a random email with a "click me!" attachment and you're silly enough to open and BOOM child porn) it is not a criminal act, as long as the individual reports the incident if it is noted.

  20. #20
    I guess seeing a penis is actually more dangerous than seeing a nipple.

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •