How were the dems in charge exactly? The President? If the dems were in charge, the elected Presidents nomination for the supreme court would be approved instead of those asshates in the senate sitting around waiting for someone else to nominate a justice. All they are doing is handcuffing the highest court in the land. But yes, the dems are in charge.
The thing is, that's what they've been doing for decades already, and that's why minimum wage needs the massive increase it currently does. The result is the entire economy slows down because of it. Governments measure this number and how much money it costs every year, it's not some fictional narrative.
Government policy should be based on reality; cause and effect of legislation. Not mindless bullshit rhetoric.
Last edited by Daerio; 2016-05-10 at 11:55 PM.
The problem I see with many in the veteran community, is that they think they will exit the service and walk into a job making the same if not more than what they are making in the service.
It's sad, but definitely not the reality, that's why I always encouraged my troops to use their TA when they were in.
Yeah, the military is downright shitty when it comes to preparing the enlisted for the real world. I knew a ton of guys who just assumed they'd find a job while on terminal leave. Of course, the military has no desire to change, since they want soldiers to be scared to get out. It helps keep re-enlistments up.
Imo we need more companies to come out that are willing to use a sustainable model and the population needs to provide them with overwhelming support. More places like this. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alvarado_Street_Bakery
You're talking about forcibly taking money from people who have used government and tax dollars to allocate money to themselves as their means of success. The Waltons have gained an enormous portion of their success from allocating tax dollars to themselves, and yet when it's suggested we tax them more, it's "theft".
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
But it really does not need the massive increase that people think it does. The current minimum wage is not far off from past years when you take inflation into account. There's absolutely no reason to think that it should be $15 an hour nationwide, since we've never been close to that in any year. Our highest when adjusted for inflation was about $10:50. Even then, it was more of an outlier than anything else.
http://www.financialramblings.com/ar...mum-wage-rate/
http://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank...-minimum-wage/
Last edited by Machismo; 2016-05-11 at 12:15 AM.
That mentality only works if ALL the people you want to take money from did that. If not, you are trying to steal money from them in order to enact some personal justice, even if they may have never done anything to deserve it. Not all wealthy people got there by screwing over strangers.
Pay and benefits are not a reward for services rendered. They are a means of attracting qualified individuals to provide desired services. If the pay is not sufficient for your valuable services, take them elsewhere. If your services are not valuable enough to entice employers to pay you sufficient to your needs, then I suggest you either find a way to increase your market value or find a way to live more modestly. Screaming for politicians to arbitrarily set your value so high that your services are prohibitively expensive to employers will only result in your job being rendered obsolete by automation or being sent elsewhere where the labor is cheaper.
It is not the strongest who survive, nor the most intelligent, but rather the most adaptive to change. Adapt to your reality and achieve on your own merit. You will find there is much greater satisfaction in making your own way under your own power than having your prosperity handed to you. In truth, when it is handed to you, it doesn't even feel like prosperity. It just becomes the new perception of poverty and you will just start screaming for more.
Blah, blah, blah, bullshit, bullshit, bullshit.
No one was asking for a handout. No one was asking for anything to be handed to them.
They were asking for a living wage. Not a great salary. Not to be rich.
Just to work a real job and not have to be on welfare to fucking eat.
At some point, you conservatives are going to run out of jobs that you feel its ok to be paid below a living wage to have. I hope yours is next quite frankly.
"When Facism comes to America, it will be wrapped in a flag and carrying a cross." - Unknown
Pretty much this, I don't even talk about what I did with my own family, I could care less about doing it with complete strangers. If anything vets get triggered when they witness random people attacking there own. At that point our sense of loyalty kicks in and we defend our brother/sister.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
Your error is in presuming that the people making the decisions care about that. They don't.
By the time those problems come home to roost, they'll have already made their millions, retired, and fucked off to The Bahamas to sip umbrella drinks whilst surrounded by scantily clad women/men, so why would they care if their former employer or former nation goes bankrupt?
Last edited by Masark; 2016-05-11 at 12:57 AM.
Warning : Above post may contain snark and/or sarcasm. Try reparsing with the /s argument before replying.
What the world has learned is that America is never more than one election away from losing its goddamned mindMe on Elite : Dangerous | My WoW charactersOriginally Posted by Howard Tayler
Well they might wait till the company that they are running is on the verge of bankruptcy, use their political connections to scare and blackmail government to bail them out since they are "too big to fall", and give themselves huge bonuses, while the companies are facing multibillion losses.
Without actually giving a fuck about thousands of people that need to be let go to cut costs, and optimize the business.
Oh and while they are at it - call the people that want to get a decent pay for their honest jobs asking for handouts, wellfare leeches and so on.
That is quite ironic.