Anyway to limit this to hot boobs only? Lol
The female breast is a sex organ. The size isn't for utility, it's an evolutionary trait for the purpose of attracting a mate. Breastfeeding works fine with a flat chest. Men's breasts are not sexual because they do not serve a reproductive purpose. Your argument is based on appearance not purpose, when purpose can often change our view of an appearance. An elbow from a certain angle can look like a vagina, so should going bottomless be ok? Just because two unrelated things look similar doesn't mean they are.
EDIT: Apologies for the following vulgarity, I'll spoiler tag it out.
If you are insistent on comparing two structurally similar parts of the body, compare anuses. If you're into anal sex, shouldn't you be bisexual if all that matters is appearance?
Last edited by Rhaide; 2016-05-20 at 09:38 PM.
I think I've had enough of removing avatars today that feature girls covered in semen. Closing.
-Darsithis
Sounds distracting but people would get used to it after a while.
Also GoTopLess is hosting an event in August close to here so I'm looking forward to seeing what kind of point they are trying to make.
http://www.fnp.de/lokales/frankfurt/...;art675,486623
Apparently he went missing, its been I while since I last saw him.
I am for keeping the status quo. I wouldn't say that I am exactly prudish but let's face it most people by definition are ugly which means most women in the world are ugly. Now I am of the mind that a fine specimen of woman or man should be paraded and celebrated but that is not for the average person.
I think I've had enough of removing avatars today that feature girls covered in semen. Closing.
-Darsithis
It is absolutely not a sex organ, it is a feeding mechanism. The reason why we are attracted to breasts is because they have been sexualized by society, not biology.
The only reason why a pre-historic male might be attracted to larger breasts is because it hints at the ability to eat a lot (sustain yourself) and feed a lot (sustain your offspring). It is the same for wider hips. Our society has twisted that and made it sexual. It shouldn't be.
I don't consider myself part of 'everyone' and am thus not 'anyone', and now I am triggered.
- - - Updated - - -
Breast size is not correlative with food consumption. You should know that, it's common knowledge. As for 'not being sexual': http://www.babycenter.com/404_is-it-...lk_10310185.bc
Breast size has nothing to do with breastfeeding. It is an evolved sexual trait. This is fact.
- - - Updated - - -
OOOOH, and ad hominem attack! You're so good at this. You seem very intelligent.
I think I've had enough of removing avatars today that feature girls covered in semen. Closing.
-Darsithis
Not only should they be allowed to... they should be compelled to. Freedom for all, whether they want it or not.
"Quack, quack, Mr. Bond."
"Just because you read it on the internet, doesn't mean the person actually said it." - Thomas Jefferson
Since reading is an early primary school skill, I'm going to assume you are 4-5 years old. https://www.theguardian.com/science/...size-evolution
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3210352/
In case reading between the lines is hard for you, symmetry and fullness is a sign of health, and healthy attributes are what humans find attractive and *gasp* sexual.
And try not to be too intimidated by the scientific sources at the bottom of those pages I linked. I know you don't seem like facts much.
Last edited by Rhaide; 2016-05-20 at 09:56 PM.
I think I've had enough of removing avatars today that feature girls covered in semen. Closing.
-Darsithis