and then to think america is bombing syria for years now, still ISIS controls most of syria.
and then to think america is bombing syria for years now, still ISIS controls most of syria.
what about isis's biggest sponsor the united states ?
- - - Updated - - -
you're an idiot for kissing americas arse too much , remember what the us caused after they illegally invaded iraq over false claims of WMD's , the us created a vacuum in the middle that helped the no name isis group run loose and cause the western world nothing but problems. Fact is US imperialism is the cause of global terrorism in this world and you cheer people on that butcher civilians left and right
They took too much territory too fast stretching their lines too thin so they abandoned most of the territory. It has nothing to do with the pitiful US bombing campaign which is at best a token show of force.
We will not see a serious assault against ISIS from the US until Obama is out of office.
This "God bless" and flag waving in the OP is just gag inducing...
As long as innocent civilians die in the crossfire, more angry overzealous men and women will join ISIS or whatever the next version of it down the road.
#TeamLegion #UnderEarthofAzerothexpansion plz #Arathor4Alliance #TeamNoBlueHorde
Warrior-Magi
The most important thing that the United States, along with the coalition fought ISIS 4 years (or so), during which time ISIS controlled area increased several times, and only when Russia intervened in the case ISIS began to lose territory. It seems to me that the United States did not want to seriously stop ISIS and imitated his fight with him, but when Russia intervened imitation became impossible. Otherwise i cant explain how the war against ISIS lead by most powerful country in the world didnt solve anything and made the situation even worse.
In short, as we say in Russia: Coincidence? I dont think so.
Last edited by Dentelan; 2016-05-21 at 03:46 PM. Reason: im batman
Well, the problem we had to deal with was that the US was funding them by paying soldiers, contractors and what not so well that they made good ISIS targets for assault or recruitment. We've solved that problem and know we can target them economically to better success than militarily since they aren't building their economy and they don't have the trade infrastructure needed to prosecute modern warfare. And why isn't Pakistan on your list?