oh no, we do want to leave. our pm has resigned, so were in need of a brexiteer to replace him.
as i said, we'll leave when were ready.
thats the thing, we dont like being told what to do by europeans, hence why the majority voted out.
looking at what certain leaders in the eu & quite possibly yourself are saying, you still dont quite understand that fact.
Best option is to call for a new snap election and hope that the Conservative Party doesn't get destroyed totally for the next 2 election cycles (they will be lucky if they don't get destroyed next election).
Cameron was a moron thinking that a referendum was a good idea given that his argument always started with ''Europe is flawed''....Yes you will bloody lose if you argument involves half the sentence of the opposition.
With new elections you can have a party that says ''the referendum isn't binding and we have no intention of leaving the EU'' and hope for the best. Given that the Brexit side already backtracked on most of their promises this may work (their statements where all debunked before they backtracked btw).
Any case this referendum still hurts the UK by creating uncertainty, I can imagine that the Scottish will say ''screw England, we have no intention involving ourselves in your dirty political games''.
Any case the political career of Cameron is over, he will be know for the guy that at best almost didn't destroy the UK and worst the guy that brought upon the destruction of the United Kingdom.
You forget that EU don't have the luxury of letting you do that shit, if you ignore this referendum and EU say ok guys lets ignore it will become the bigger joke around the world and give birth to even more eurosceptics and every european leader will face huge backlash in its country by the opposition.
The only solution is to invoke art 50 and negotiate a deal as similar as possible of what we have now, EU lose something & UK lose something in the process but everything in the end will remain substantially unchanged.
Everyone can say they abide to the ref result and gg.
Uhm no we bloody hell don\'t.
Their are some cases that may work like that (including new members into the EU works like that) but overall the EU works around general consensus.
When the majority of the countries want something to be changed that change will happen, the actual rules may not be as strong as originally intended sometimes but that is how a democratic compromise works. Generally speaking in the end the in order to get stuff done the EU works based on compromise.
Ont he other hand we don't have a single asshole (Ted Cruz http://www.motherjones.com/politics/...ruz-jerk-hated) shutting down the entire government and then blaming the other side for not compromising.
Hell one of the complaints people from the UK have is that the EU to often does what and they don't get what they want. They even used a weird statistics like 3% of the time the EU does what the UK wants (or something like that).
The EU is fine as it is right now, if the argument involves something like ''EU is flawed because A, B or C'' then I dare to anybody find me a perfect system that we can replace the EU with. If we have 1 problem I would like to be fixed is that the EU as a whole doesn't have enough power to punish it's members for not following the agreed upon rules.
- - - Updated - - -
The EU doesn't involve itself in national politics, the fact that the UK is losing face and made itself look like a bit ass is of no concern to the rest of us.
If you have a new election and the party that wins that election wins based on a platform that says ''we aren't leaving the EU'' wins that election then the UK can limit the damage done by the stupidity of Cameron.
Doubtful. Many EU leaders already said they'd have not issue with them backing down. They would have issues with them repeating it over and over again or remain in an uncertain stage. The UK has turned itself into a giant joke. If you are at all smart as a politician you can just point over at the UK and say: "Look how well this right wing populism works! No plans but lots of hot air.". The point makes itself. The only thing the UK mentioned so far is that they tanked their economy, the leaders of the leavers already retracted all of their statements and they disabled their countries leadership. Believe me I want to see the world burn, especially when it is ruled by uneducated rabble, as I delight in their misery, but this is far from the only course of action. The biggest question is who takes the fall and how to best limit the fallout now.
Last edited by Cosmic Janitor; 2016-06-27 at 07:12 AM.
"We don't like being told what to do"
Some Brit - post brexit vote
You really don't know the potential consequences of this vote, do you.
- - - Updated - - -
Not really an option considering the amount of Euroscepticism in other countries now. If you can leave and still be "roughly the same as before" why wouldnt other eurosceptic parties in Europe ask for a similar referendum?
- - - Updated - - -
You're totally right in saying "the point makes itself".
This is just an inverse population map.
Relevant: https://xkcd.com/1138/
- - - Updated - - -
motherjones is a bad source, most clickbaits etc..
You should improve on what you read.
(this has nothing to do with the ted cruz thing there, just a remark that a bad website is bad.)
I'm British and I'm telling you and the Brexiteers that you look indecisive, weak and unprepared. Having made such a poor decision, it needs to be implemented as quickly and efficiently as possible. No one respects any one who stands around procrastinating while the global economy goes to hell.
And that's the problem they despise the fact that "oh so mighty" brittain has the same say as lets say baltic states. brittain was and wanted to be the special snowflake in whole history of EU, they did nothing but complain and went against everything and now they played I'm leaving card probably hoping to see begging from EU to stay in hopes to get better deals again, yet they got the answer to just fucking invoke art 50 already, which no one wants to do it seems...