Originally Posted by
Noradin
That is just a case of two people using the phrases "off the table" and "on the table" differently.
Slant uses "off the table" in the sense of "it does not need to be discussed, it would autmatically be part of the deal". that politican you quoted used "on the table" in the sense of "it is a package deal, so any proposal of a deal placed on the table would include it".
Both said the same really. If you put free trade on the table free movement comes along as a package deal. If you already agree that you want free trade and won't put that up for discussion ("not on the table"), then free movement isn't up for discussion either--since it is a package deal.