http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Why+Hillary+Cli...an+evil+person
You can find enough proof there if you want to look for it. Best source you can have.
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=Why+Hillary+Cli...an+evil+person
You can find enough proof there if you want to look for it. Best source you can have.
I don't hate her.
But I specifically feel that she is a hypocrite by campaigning to reduce/remove/whatever money from politics, while her primary political backers remain some of the wealthiest people in the world. You can't take money from the Devil and then claim you're not going to allow people to take money from the Devil.
Human progress isn't measured by industry. It's measured by the value you place on a life.
Just, be kind.
On MMO-C we learn that Anti-Fascism is locking arms with corporations, the State Department and agreeing with the CIA, But opposing the CIA and corporate America, and thinking Jews have a right to buy land and can expect tenants to pay rent THAT is ultra-Fash Nazism. Bellingcat is an MI6/CIA cut out. Clyburn Truther.
'Twas a cutlass swipe or an ounce of lead
Or a yawing hole in a battered head
And the scuppers clogged with rotting red
And there they lay I damn me eyes
All lookouts clapped on Paradise
All souls bound just contrarywise, yo ho ho and a bottle of rum!
The problem with Hillary is she has been in the spotlight so many times for such a long time period that so many different things are and have been available to the public. I'm not sure you need a source to begin with, because chances are the negative comments directed at her are true.
- - - Updated - - -
You asked for a source. I gave you the largest available source.
I've seen people say that they know Trump is a liar but will still support him anyway, his being a liar is okay. The Republican hate for Hilary goes all the way back to her being on the Watergate investigation team that led to Nixon's resignation.
I don't hate Hillary. She get's a little shrill when she gets loud but most women do.
.
"This will be a fight against overwhelming odds from which survival cannot be expected. We will do what damage we can."
-- Capt. Copeland
It's the rate at which she does it that is alarming. From a very basic psychological standpoint, it shows that she isn't going on a moral compass of her own. She's riding the tide.
No, by technicality she actually hasn't won. She kind of forgot the fact that superdelegates haven't actually voted yet, they don't do that until the actual decision is made. So yes, that was a play to demoralize Sanders supporters.
I'm guessing you do not watch any television media.
You're missing one of the crucial parts of the campaign; the actual election. Donald Trump is an absolute master at mudslinging and honestly Hillary has so much mud to sling at that he's going to have a field day. Hillary has been painted by many as a shady individual because frankly, she is shady. She has a current FBI investigation that is of yet unresolved, the sheer level of flipflopping on issues, her bouncing between proud proclamations of both liberal and conservative views in a fairly short span of time...the problem with Hillary is that people frankly don't know who she is. Hillary is the living icon of political corruption and one of the shadiest political candidates we've ever seen.
The details around his loss, with the superdelegates and the media string-pulling is exactly why people don't like her. That was the question, and I gave you an answer.
This has nothing to do with Sanders, it has to do with Hillary. But the Sanders situation and the way she has responded to it is another very strong knock against her character.
Congratulations, that beautiful post of your showed that you read absolutely nothing I wrote. Please actually read next time you want to engage in a conversation.
I think it's fairly obvious I'm not a Trump supporter. I'm not a Hillary supporter, either. I'd call myself a Bernie Sanders supporter, but honestly I'm more of just a supporter of any political candidate who isn't a corrupt shitshow of a human being. I'd probably vote for Hillary before Trump, but to pretend that Trump has zero support among minorities and women is ignorance. Should they support him? Probably not, but many will.
Last edited by Irian; 2016-06-09 at 12:39 AM.
I hate money in politics, but I have trouble hating individual politicians for using the system in the way it works right now. Getting anywhere in politics (nearly) requires that you court wealthy donors and special interests- it's hard to change the system if you don't win, and it's hard to win if you are playing with a more stringent set of rules than your opponents. What Bernie Sanders did, funding wise, was exceptional.
On MMO-C we learn that Anti-Fascism is locking arms with corporations, the State Department and agreeing with the CIA, But opposing the CIA and corporate America, and thinking Jews have a right to buy land and can expect tenants to pay rent THAT is ultra-Fash Nazism. Bellingcat is an MI6/CIA cut out. Clyburn Truther.
I find it interesting that both Trump and Hilary are being investigated by the feds and yet are the top contenders for the primary race. Isn't this a first in any presidential race? For any presidential candidate to be under investigation and still run?
Because she's a liar, out of touch with the American people, too aggressive in her foreign policy, won't be respected by the majority of foreign male leaders, ineffective SoS during her tenure in office, etc...
Did I mention she's a liar?
Because shes a woman obviously.
But seriously She and her husband are probably the most two-faced lieing politicians of this generation. She just wants power, nothing more. She'd sell out anything in order to get elected, she doesn't care about anyone but herself.
I wouldn't vote for Bill (I was too young) and I won't vote for Hillary.
Because she is a politician. Not the profession. The personality type. Just like how that other crazy clown you have running around on the loose over there is a businessman.
At least Bernie is only a politician by profession.
- - - Updated - - -
You can close the thread now. I posted.
And yet, it's been shown time and again that there was nothing more she could have done personally, and she holds no responsibility for what happened at Benghazi. People need to get over that whole thing. We send American troops to the most dangerous locations in the world, and then use their deaths from that danger as political ammo. It's frankly pathetic to use American lives in such a petty way.
I dislike her because she's very obviously establishment politician, moneyed and has the continued interests of banks and big business at the heart of economic policy. Purely right wing economics. Her social policy is sound though, and is very much socially liberal. Any liberal voting Trump as a protest foot is seriously shooting themselves in the foot there.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
It's funny how easily deceived people have been by the Benghazi and email smear campaigns. People claim she's getting away with it because she's a politician, and yet it's her enemies, the Republicans, who were the ones doing the investigations and inquiries, and they couldn't actually find anything on it.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"