America's unique place in the world gives it a responsibility to protect, as in the case of Libya, though again, that was a mostly British/French show where the US reluctantly provided the muscle.
There is a very fine line we need to monitor though between fulfilling that responsibility to protect, as we did in Kosovo, and looking for dragons to slay. Military adventurism serves us poorly.
Some folks want a neat and tidy doctrine. But really, this is so complex and the implications so huge, the only way to go about it is a case by case basis.
But as you can see from the leak today that 51 people in the US State Department basically demanding US military action against Assad in Syria, the R2P runs very deep institutionally in the US. Regardless of the merits of their argument (which I dont have time to argue atm, gotta go do werk), it does yet again illustrate how isolated Obama, Susan Rice, John Kerry and Ben Rhodes have become from the US Foreign Policy establishment. They run a freakshow foreign policy so outside the norm, they have no allies within the State Department who are believers of it.
Oh well. 180 more days.
Btw, we all remember what west were saying about war in Chechnya "Russians are killing children and womens,they are not terrorists, they are rebels" etc. Problem is, these rebels staged terrorist attacks and cutted of heads of prisoners. And west recognized it only after the Russian victory in this civil war. Maybe west would recognize that it all started with the terrorist Muslims in Yugoslavia, only this time the Serbs have lost, and the winner chose the truth.
I mean theres no body getting killed in Crimea except ordinary criminal may be, there is a peace. I see your point of view. Mine is:
The armed overthrow of the government. Parts of the country do not take no legitimate new government and its decisions. Begins collapse of the country. Donbass rebels. Crimea is separated and asks to join Russia.
Whatever it was they knew, it was enough to act despite possible backlash. And with Clinton email scandal and various other breaches (Western special services caught one of top Italian NATO officials supplying Russia with secret documents recently, and he isn't the only one) it's obvious that they knew a lot.
You seem to be confused. It doesn't need to be proven, "better safe then sorry" acts on assumptions, not rock-solid proofs. Ukrainians made overtures toward NATO before, and even supplied Georgians with BUKs and S-300 which cost us several planes in short Georgian War.So when Russians arent getting their lease exteneded, they invade instead? And you still havent provided anything about US bases there, other than "school looks like barracks", wtf?
You didn't. NATO obviously did. See our exchange about Baltics entering NATO above. Hell, just look at Western response to Georgian War in 2008 (even though in the end Russians were completely vindicated in starting it).It's obvious that you're using the current NATO buildup and exersises, as some kind of "that's why we did it" excuse, completely ignoring that NATO in Europe did not look at Russia with the same eyes before you invaded Crimea,
Why exactly do you have no doubt?I have no doubt that the US would rather focus on Asia, instead of cold war V.2
I realise that we see what happened in Crimea from completely different viewpoints, and I understand the reasoning behind yours altho I do not agree with Russias reaction at all.
And tbh, the situation is not solved by arguing Kosovo, Chechnya, Libya etc. We do realise when we fuck up, one example of this is the situation with ISIS, the West is pretty reluctant to go all in, because history tells us it'll go tits up one way or the other, and instead of beeing accused of doing to much, we're now accused of doing too little by pro-russians, we're damned if we do and damned if we dont.
as i said, there was no genocide, just ethnic cleansing, which doesn't necessarily involve killing everyone - killing and attacking just enough of them daily so the others have no choice but run for their lives, since there was no one to protect them considering that nato got involved on the side of the muslim terrorists
Jesus christ you're grasping for straws, keep at it, I miss the "our economy is fine" Shalcker, what happened, your economy got affected and you jumped the "OMG NATO WILL INVADE" crowd.
btw when did the baltics join NATO? and did NATO buildup an invasion army after that? oh wait they didnt.