Cancer is the meme of the medical world.
Alcohol and tobacco? Cancer.
Eating an apple a day? Cancer.
Taking a left turn without using the turn signal? Cancer.
Visiting your grandmother every month? Ultra cancer.
Eh.
Cancer is the meme of the medical world.
Alcohol and tobacco? Cancer.
Eating an apple a day? Cancer.
Taking a left turn without using the turn signal? Cancer.
Visiting your grandmother every month? Ultra cancer.
Eh.
There are cancer warnings on coffee? The only warning it should need is ''Remember to brush your teeth twice a day or let your teeth become yellower than the sun''
He makes a very strong point that not peer-reviewing studies is a serious problem. It seems like the only studies that get the sort of extreme scrutiny needed to squeeze truth out of "maybe"'s only happen when people have some objection to the science's conclusion, like with evolution. It's only gotten as far as it has because people have tried so hard to disprove it, and failed. You don't get that sort of scrutiny for something like "lab mice fed chocolate doesn't seem to increase or decrease the probability of developing cancer."
I wonder how they even come to conclusion that something "might cause cancer". Perhaps they do it like this?
1. Ask 1,000 people with cancer whether they drink coffee.
2. Learn that 30% of them do.
3. Confuse correlation with causation and make a verdict that coffee might cause cancer.
I don't trust anyone that ever said EGGS are bad.
Same study:
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/hot-drinks-...r-risk-1565608
However, this goes under the general heading of: if it is painful it might be bad for you.
Peer-reviewing doesn't help 95% is normally significant enough for them.
That means that out of 20 studies 1 will by chance find an incorrect and shocking result. Peer-reviewers cannot find any fault, and that study will be seen in TV - the other 19 might not be published.
And then that is combined with study-goal-posting, you make a study to find if coffee cause cancer - you don't see any real evidence, and then switch to investigating if it isn't all but just: hot, cold, arabica beans, or the other beans, coffee with milk, espresso, latte, machiato, strong coffee, turkisk coffee, americano, frapucinno, ice coffee, kopi luwak, ...
For fucks sake, our own planet gives us cancer, what do you think all those naturally occurring radioactive elements beneath our feet are doing?
Not to mention the figuratively literal giant ball of nuclear fusion right above our heads?
Walking with a friend in the dark is better than walking alone in the light.
So I chose the path of the Ebon Blade, and not a day passes where i've regretted it.
I am eternal, I am unyielding, I am UNDYING.
I am Zethras, and my blood will be the end of you.
I could've been preventing cancer all this time?
Is bacon good for you yet?
I eat bacon every day for breakfast, in a sandwich along with an egg and cheddar cheese on a sourdough english muffin.
sweet, check coffee off the list!
now if i can just get them to lay off chewing tobacco and alcohol...
and pot...
and meat...
No sense crying over spilt beer, unless you're drunk...
Good. Means all these decades of me drinking coffee will not cause me to die from cancer.
All the things cause and do not cause cancer.
"Be polite, be professional, but have a plan to kill everybody you meet.” - General James Mattis