I still think they can be useful and can show a general direction in a campaign, but can still be inaccurate. It was not just the Michigan primary where they got it wrong, some of Trump's wins were much larger then the polling showed. Such as SC and Indiana would be only a couple. As we near Nov, those polls will carry more weight I think when it comes to the actual election results. Even then, there is no guarantee they will be correct.
They both look crappy. Hilary looks like the less stupid of the two though, but her flip flopping scares me.
You mean *GASP* the polls claiming Bernie is a superior candidate are potentially a bunch of self affirming wank? (Made even funnier that he couldn't beat Hillary.)
Next you'll tell me the people guaranteeing a Trump victory if Hillary gets the nomination is potentially a large glob of hogwash.
The the only thing that surprised me this time are Trump being the sole survivor of the primary and just how fucking stupid some voters are. Everything else, including Bernie being a flop, has been par for the course.
Only surprise left is who will win because Trump is a variable. Up one minute and down the next.
This is exactly why a multitude of polls are used, instead of just looking to predict the outcome of an election on a single poll. When there's 10+ polls all showing Clinton with a very healthy lead, it becomes far more solid ground than if it had just been a single poll.
Also, there's the margin of error too, which is generally about 5% off. So if the actual results are 5% off or less (say for instance the poll showed Hillary with a 4% lead then she lost by 1%) then it was within the margin of error and the poll wasn't "wrong" since it was within the understood margin of error.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
Because he's not suicidal nor is he an evil genius. He sues everyone because it's easy to do and he can get away with it. To compare nuclear annihilation with a law suit is not balanced to say the least. Even if by some measure he really was that dumb I sincerely hope the men in woman in the US military would refuse such an order.
At best any threats of using nukes from trump is chicken talk from a chicken hawk. Don't buy the hype. Don't buy the fear mongering.
Last edited by Glorious Leader; 2016-06-22 at 12:26 AM.
I wouldn't put any sort of fuckery past Trump, but I trust our system of checks and balances to stop him - which is why I laugh at anyone who thinks he can keep any of his promises, like his wall or stopping the travel of Muslims. But let's be honest, Hillary is the status quo, which isn't great, but is not terrible in the least. Trump is a failure of a businessman, has narcissistic personality disorder paired with dementia, and as our primary diplomat would be awful for our foreign relations. Most foreigners hate him already, and he isn't even in the white house.
Someone almost always inevitably asks what it matters what other people think of our leader... and it takes an incredibly shallow thinking person to not consider what a complete and utter asshole, who gets his panties in a twist over the slightest insult, might do as our primary diplomat and face of our foreign relations.
Last edited by Cthulhu 2020; 2016-06-22 at 12:32 AM.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
Yea I agree Hillary is awful as well but Trump isn't actually for Nuclear annihilation. I think we take the outrageous shit he says at face value but I don't think he's earned that privelege. Put it this way, I think theirs equally or even a better chance of someone like Hillary taking us to war then their is with Trump. That's not to say Trump won't but his fear mongering isn't backed up by anything. Hillary is a fucking ruthless blood hungry war driven bitch.
Trump has already declared that he wants to put 25k boots on the ground in the middle east, which is an enormous military movement. She's a warmonger because she voted for a war that pretty much every single other Senator voted for? Ok, what else? Every time people tell me why they think she's a warmonger, it's a very small list of incredibly weak evidence like that. There's been no evidence of recent aggressive international intent.
You know Trump's personality (or do you?). He's easily insulted and flies off the handle at the slightest insult. He himself is an asshole who provokes and taunts people. Hillary is trying to diffuse people's fears of Muslims while Trump is throwing TNT onto the fire of Muslim hate.
You think Trump would take us through peace, but Hillary is the war mongering bitch?
Pass that crack pipe, cause that must be some gooooooooooood stuff.
2014 Gamergate: "If you want games without hyper sexualized female characters and representation, then learn to code!"
2023: "What's with all these massively successful games with ugly (realistic) women? How could this have happened?!"
Seriously... I'm still stuck on this one: Trump is a germaphobe and hates having to shake people's hands. Has anyone explained to him that the primary job of the US President is shaking people's hands?
For that matter, he threatens to sue far more than he ever actually sues.
- - - Updated - - -
I mean if she's such a warmonger then surely the Republican base should be happy to vote for her?
- - - Updated - - -
I think you'd have to be pretty gullible to believe a word Trump has said in this campaign.
Or ever, really. How much more obvious can he make it?
Hmm. It appears the "Delegates should vote their conscience" part of the Anti-Trump group, that Trump says doesn't exist but Jeb Bush is its leader has a new member. Scott Walker.
Scott Walker: GOP Delegates Should 'Vote The Way They See Fit
Wisconsin Gov. Scott Walker is following House Speaker Paul Ryan's (R-WI) lead in urging delegates to the Republican National Convention to vote their conscience on Donald Trump, according to The Capital Times.
Walker, who was critical of the presumptive nominee during the GOP primary, told reporters that he agreed with fellow Wisconsinite Ryan's advice that delegates should follow their gut.
"I think historically, and not just this year, delegates are able, are and should be able to vote the way they see fit," Walker said, according to the paper.
Walker said he would follow the rules of the Wisconsin GOP and cast his vote for Sen. Ted Cruz (R-TX), who won the Wisconsin primary and whom Walker endorsed before the senator dropped out.
The governor told reporters he's not totally sold on Trump yet because of his comments about U.S. District Judge Gonzalo Curiel, but would "leave it up" to GOP leaders to decide how the convention will go.
http://talkingpointsmemo.com/livewir...ote-conscience
What are we gonna do now? Taking off his turban, they said, is this man a Jew?
'Cause they're working for the clampdown
They put up a poster saying we earn more than you!
When we're working for the clampdown
We will teach our twisted speech To the young believers
We will train our blue-eyed men To be young believers
I wonder what effect Trump losing or winning the election will have on the republican party.
Can we just vote already? It's going to take forever until he inevitably loses in November.
"Punching things is cool and stuff. Pow bam bam bam Pow. O yah... God I'm eloquent." -Dalai Lama