The eye witness testimony is irrelevant. The videos that have been posted in this thread are unclear because the view is obstructed.
We don't know whether he was reaching for it, or reasonably appeared to be reaching for it. Reaching a conclusion one way or the other is extremely biased. If he was reaching for it, they should have killed him. If he wasn't, then they shouldn't have. It's that simple.
But they are Americans. Do you mean that citizens in america can't climb out of the lower class? Isn't that the whole idea behind the country? Working your way up from the shit and becoming something. Can it be, just a small chance, that it's harder (more difficult) for the average african-american to climb out of poverty because of their skin colour?
He had a gun? did anyone else here that?
Surely the history of "economics" going back hundred years shouldn't matter in such a modern society as America where these kids are born? This is about systemic oppression of black people. There's no way to hide it, it's out there for everyone who's not a fucking puppet to see. How to evolve from it is difficult though, but it might solve many of Americas obvious problem with gun-related killings.
It's actually an inverse requirement in some places. Courts ruled in a semi-notable case that police can refuse to hire candidates whose IQ tests too high. The idea was that more intelligent cops are more prone to boredom, and thus more susceptible to corruption and abuse.