I cant see anything wrong with white people destroying the buisness model of africans. /s
I cant see anything wrong with white people destroying the buisness model of africans. /s
It is a big issue. It's very hard to fake anything. And if you success in making a perfect - identical - fake, then it no longer is a fake.
I find the whole plan a bit fucked up. "Here, let's give these criminals (who we are pretty much fighting against in the first place) free shit that they can sell to other criminals for 60k/kg"Once the poachers have it who cares? At that point the risk to them is the same if it's real or not.
It's lunacy and morally very questionable. "What could go wrong?"
Except that it removes the need for them to kill rhinos in the first place. Sure it's not the ideal solution but if it lets one criminal fool another criminal into paying 60k/kg then fine by me, aren't they both criminals anyhow. Rhino gets left alone, which is the whole point here.
Do not wait to strike till the iron is hot; but make it hot by striking.
Yeah. And suddenly we have 10 million would-be poachers saying "give me free stuff or I'll go hunting rhinos".
It's about as smart as paying criminals for not committing crimes.
If anything, we should sell the fake horns directly to the buyers and saturate the market, putting the poachers out of business. That way we could also learn the buyer network and eventually eliminate it.
Last edited by mmocf7a456daa4; 2016-07-07 at 11:23 PM.
So give them free stuff. It won't cost all that much to produce and a company can gain immense public image by funding the cessation of rhino hunting. I don't exactly see the problem.
Feels like you're just arguing for the sake of argument now. First it was stupid and wouldn't work because it's not real. Then it became impossible to tell if it grew on a rhino or not. Then it became a bad idea because it would be illegal to own and produce it. Then it became morally questionable because it's dealing with criminals despite possibly stopping them killing an endangered species. Then it's shady because a company wants to make money (lol). Then it's money laundering.
Either you just don't want to see any good in this or you're just arguing for the sake of it. Hard to tell at this point.
If you have a better solution I'd like to hear it rather than you trying to shoot holes in a possible solution.
Do not wait to strike till the iron is hot; but make it hot by striking.
Now you are getting the hang of it - the whole idea of 3D printing rhino horns to save rhinos from poaching is a mess on so many different levels with gazillions of technical, legal and moral loopholes in it.
It's reality that they can make great rhino horn copies, but it's utopistic to think that the "saving of rhinos" would become reality with this plan.
Dunno about better, but expensive and definitely more realistic solutions - like harsher penalties for criminals and more safeguarding of the rhinos. Even the poisoning of the horns Gabriel suggested is a better option (for the rhinos) than this ambiguous financial scheme.If you have a better solution I'd like to hear it rather than you trying to shoot holes in a possible solution.
It's like printing more dollars to save the economy.
There is no way to cure stupidity in vietnam, and buying a horn that is worthless for mucho grande is the epitome of stupidity.
They'll just move on to the next stupid like rhino skin.
Exciting!
However i do not think it will save the Rhinos, possibly decrease the poaching rate. Hopefully i am wrong