Originally Posted by
eschatological
People forget that Malcolm X's movement was happening at the same time as MLK's, a movement which specifically advocated violence against whites. And there was a great debate in the black community about which approach was right. Ultimately, some people say Malcolm X pushed white people to accept MLK more readily, because they were willing to invest in MLK's dream to avoid Malcolm's nightmare (Malcolm X once famously said, "Dr King may have a dream, but I see a nightmare.") And Malcolm, before he was assassinated, eventually came over to MLK's point of view, because he realized he was being propped up by white racists as a reason to not support black rights and the peaceful protests of MLK. And then he was killed by his own people, for capitulating.
The black civil rights movement constantly had to press the idea that minorities had to be better than their white counterparts. If they wanted to push for equality, they had to be better than them. Read James Cone's Martin & Malcolm & America, it's a pretty good read. I think BLM has to press that issue further, and move away from anger and divisiveness in their speech, even if they aren't specifically promoting violence. MLK used to say that speech had the potential to be violent, as well, and the true believer in non-violence never spoke violently.
Fast forward to 2016:
These movements now are much more meshed, and less distinct. There are no clear leaders on both sides, but instead you have a decentralized movement with hundreds of thousands of people who can be attributed as "members" without ever doing anything, who have no standard of research or measuredness, etc. And it exists on the right as well. Social media has become an echo chamber for the ignorant to perpetuate ideas which should normally just die in the marketplace of ideas. You can use a hastag #BLM or #BlackLivesMatter and suddenly be a spokesperson for a movement even if you've never left your house in support of the movement. And some of these kids say the same shit Malcolm X said, except in an even less educated way. And BLM, a movement that is multi-cultural and trying to be peaceful, is held as violent and racist because of the traction idiots with access to a global stage get, because then the idiots on the other side can cherry pick a dozen tweets out of hundreds of thousands and paint with wide strokes. I'm sure in the 60s, there were young black youth who would have said the same thing as some of the these kids, but they didn't have the ability to broadcast that ignorant opinion to the whole world and be used as a weapon against the movement at large.
It's kind of a mess, social media is involved in it, but it's a larger problem of a general shallowness of discourse.