But social media was not the only forum for criticism.
Writing in Vox, Zack Beauchamp called the Post’s move “irresponsible” and suggested it was a cynical attempt to drive sales:
Implying that one horrible event is part of a nationwide wave of violence makes problems seem far worse than they are. That’s especially bad when the implication is that black Americans demonstrating for their rights are the source of the problem. The last thing you want to do at a time when racial tensions are running high is to suggest that black people are waging war on the police, when they are most certainly not doing anything of the sort.
There’s no legitimate journalistic justification for what the New York Post did. Things are bad enough in America when you just look at the facts, honestly.
But I guess you can say one thing for the New York Post: Capitalizing on racialized fear after a tragedy will probably help it sell papers.
Irresponsible was the word of choice as well for Huffington Post’s Michael Calderone. “Shockingly irresponsible,” he wrote of the choice, “even for a paper that once recklessly insinuated two bystanders at the Boston Marathon bombing were suspects in the attack.”