Before Cruelle claimed I would not have even considered that roleclaim possible in a back-to-basics game, and would have lynched you on the spot.
Now... I have no idea. It could be worth testing. Problem is, only way to take advantage of that if you're telling the truth it is to not lynch you.
That makes this smell of a "you shouldn't lynch me because I am useful" fakeclaim. In short, it doesn't inspire faith.
--
On the bigger topic: taking stands one way or another on subjects, is a very town activity, exactly because it gives a clear indicator or someone who was on the "wrong side of a scum defence". Case in point, you preferred to lynch one unknown player over a now known scum. That could mean two things:
- You're scum trying to deflect a lynch off your scumbuddy
- You're town taking that stance using flawed reads.
It's initially impossible to really tell which it is for me. However, it's a damned good lead that I can't just ignore. The reason taking stands is a town activity is that scum should be careful to not to get into your situation in the first place if they can avoid it, because as you can see, it generates votes. Being vocal and pushing people is only a town read as long as they are correct. (meaning: a mafioso scumhunting perfectly is bound to end up in a very weak position, a mafioso scumhunting badly will end up lynched). Does that mean town shouldn't push people around? Hell no. It's vital to be done. But it means a town player sometimes pay for being wrong.
Which is you; scum or town? That's where character reads come in. My impression is that you usually hold back a bit as scum. I don't think you took many risks when we played in the west wing game. In fact, you were probably the best player on our team when it came to not standing out. So yes, you are right that this game is a change; you're not ducking completely. You're taking stands. I must hold that in your favour actually.
Is it enough for me to want to step up and vouch for you? No actually. Out of all the players, you're still the person I think is the most scummy. It's just not a 100% read. I just won't be gobsmacked if you're town. It's a possibility, just not a big one. I still want to lynch you. Your claim doesn't help too much changing that. Note however, that in taking this stance, I am sticking my neck out too. If you end up town, the others will start distrusting me a bit more tomorrow. And should tomorrow end in a real disaster with me lynched for going after you, the person pushing me will then be in the same position the day after. But that's how this game flows. Being accurate is vital. And damned hard.
--
My read on you is that you're improving your playstyle, evolving as a player. I like the change, just not the results. It doesn't tell me much of whether you are scum or town.
Now in your case, I would totally have told Shirokitsune to vote for me at the end of Day 2. Or have Dupti or myself vote for you on Day 1, even. You don't even have to give explain that reason, it's not that hard to tell someone to vote for you. Exploit your ability. Get that investigation off and settle - or not - your distrust, and get major town cred in the process. The fact that you didn't speaks heavily against you. Because I seriously think you would have thought about doing something like that had your claim actually been real.
So in short, no I think you are scum.
Let's formalize that.
vote: Cruelle
I nominate Cruelle to take out Kryllian.